Planning application
6 Southwood Gardens Cookham Maidenhead SL6 9EB
Works: Extension
Permission granted. Work must normally begin within three years of the decision or the permission lapses.
Proposal
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed conservatory is lawful.
As published by the council, reference 21/02386/CPD
Application record
- Reference
- 21/02386/CPD
- Type
- Cert of Lawfulness of Proposed Dev
- Status
- Decided
- Decision
- Granted As published: Permitted Development
- Received
- 29 Jul 2021
- Validated
- 16 Aug 2021
- Decided
- 11 Oct 2021
- Ward
- Bisham And Cookham
- Parish
- Cookham Parish
- Decision by
- Delegated
- Postcode
- SL6 9EB
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
29 Jul 2021
Received by Windsor and Maidenhead
-
16 Aug 2021
Validated
Checked as complete and ready for consideration.
-
11 Oct 2021
Decision issued: Permitted Development
-
2 Sep 2026
Added to PlanIndex
Documents
Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report
8 documents on file for this application
A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.
Watch members (£5 a month) open the document list from here.
Open the documentsWhat this grant of permission means
Windsor and Maidenhead granted permission on 11 October 2021, subject to any conditions on the decision notice. Work must normally begin within three years or the permission lapses. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.
About lawful development applications
A lawful development certificate is a legal determination that existing or proposed works do not need planning permission; the merits of the scheme are not considered. More in our guide to planning application types.
Nearby applications
Within 0.3 miles
-
23 Southwood Gardens Cookham Maidenhead SL6 9EB
Single storey side extension and alterations to fenestration
Granted Full applications Extension Windows or glazing 16 docsSmall domestic -
9 Southwood Gardens Cookham Maidenhead SL6 9EB
Single storey rear extension following demolition of the existing conservatory.
Granted Full applications Extension Demolition 9 docsSmall domestic -
Site A AndSite B Open Field North of Lower Mount Farm Long Lane Cookham Maidenhead SL6 9EE
Consent to retain 4no. non illuminated post mounted signs, 4no. non illuminated flag pole signs and non illuminated hoarding.
Granted Advertising 15 docs -
8 Cannon Down Cottages Maidenhead Road Cookham Maidenhead SL6 9EA
Part single, part two storey side/rear extension following the demolition of the existing single storey element.
Refused Full applications Extension Demolition 8 docsSmall domestic -
10 Southwood Road Cookham Maidenhead SL6 9LY
Single storey side extension.
Granted Full applications Extension 8 docsSmall domestic -
28 Southwood Gardens Cookham Maidenhead SL6 9EB
New front canopy, single storey front extension, first floor side/rear extension and alterations to fenestration
Granted Full applications Extension Windows or glazing 13 docsSmall domestic
Other lawful development applications
In Windsor and Maidenhead
-
26/02222/CPD Refused
52 Audley Way Ascot SL5 8EF
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed single storey rear extension following the removal of the existing conservatory is lawful.
-
26/01954/CPD Withdrawn
Mulberry House Waltham Road Maidenhead SL6 3NH
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the single storey rear extension is lawful.
-
26/01856/CLU Granted
Apple Tree Cottage And Land Adjacent To Apple Tree Cottage Paley Street Maidenhead
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the existing use of the land as a residential garden incidental to the main dwelling is lawful
-
26/02022/CPD Refused
14 Church View White Waltham Maidenhead SL6 3JQ
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed 1no. rear dormer and alterations to fenestration are lawful
-
26/01862/CLU Granted
Holyport Pre School Holyport Youth Club Moneyrow Green Holyport Maidenhead SL6 2NA
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the existing use of the site as a pre-school is lawful.