Planning application
Woodpeckers 13 Woodlands Close Ascot SL5 9HU
Permission granted. Work must normally begin within three years of the decision or the permission lapses.
Proposal
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed drop kerb is lawful.
As published by the council, reference 20/02875/CPD
Application record
- Reference
- 20/02875/CPD
- Type
- Cert of Lawfulness of Proposed Dev
- Status
- Decided
- Decision
- Granted As published: Permitted Development
- Received
- 30 Oct 2020
- Validated
- 23 Nov 2020
- Decided
- 18 Jan 2021
- Ward
- Ascot & Sunninghill
- Parish
- Sunninghill And Ascot Parish
- Decision by
- Delegated
- Postcode
- SL5 9HU
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
30 Oct 2020
Received by Windsor and Maidenhead
-
23 Nov 2020
Validated
Checked as complete and ready for consideration.
-
18 Jan 2021
Decision issued: Permitted Development
-
12 Sep 2026
Added to PlanIndex
Documents
Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report
6 documents on file for this application
A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.
Watch members (£5 a month) open the document list from here.
Open the documentsWhat this grant of permission means
Windsor and Maidenhead granted permission on 18 January 2021, subject to any conditions on the decision notice. Work must normally begin within three years or the permission lapses. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.
About lawful development applications
A lawful development certificate is a legal determination that existing or proposed works do not need planning permission; the merits of the scheme are not considered. More in our guide to planning application types.
Nearby applications
Within 0.3 miles
-
-
4 Woodlands Close Ascot SL5 9HU
First floor side extension, x1 side rooflight and alterations to fenestration including x2 rear Juliet balconies.
Refused Full applications Extension Loft or dormer +1 10 docs -
4 Woodlands Close Ascot SL5 9HU
Two storey front/side extension, 2no. first floor enclosed balconies and alterations to fenestration.
Refused Full applications Extension Windows or glazing 11 docs -
4 Woodlands Close Ascot SL5 9HU
Details required by Condition 3 (Tree Protection) of Planning Permission 21/02919 for Part single, part two storey front/side extension with velux windows to single storey element, 2no. rear enclosed balconies with gable feature and alterations to fenestration.
Granted Conditions Extension Loft or dormer +2 6 docsSmall domestic -
4 Woodlands Close Ascot SL5 9HU
Part single, part two storey front/side extension with velux windows to single storey element, 2no. rear enclosed balconies with gable feature and alterations to fenestration.
Granted Full applications Extension Loft or dormer +1 14 docsSmall domestic -
4 Woodlands Close Ascot SL5 9HU
Non material amendments to planning permission 21/02919/FULL for a front porch beneath the approved catslide roof.
Granted Amendments Extension 4 docsSmall domestic
Other lawful development applications
In Windsor and Maidenhead
-
26/02222/CPD Refused
52 Audley Way Ascot SL5 8EF
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed single storey rear extension following the removal of the existing conservatory is lawful.
-
26/01954/CPD Withdrawn
Mulberry House Waltham Road Maidenhead SL6 3NH
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the single storey rear extension is lawful.
-
26/01856/CLU Granted
Apple Tree Cottage And Land Adjacent To Apple Tree Cottage Paley Street Maidenhead
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the existing use of the land as a residential garden incidental to the main dwelling is lawful
-
26/02022/CPD Refused
14 Church View White Waltham Maidenhead SL6 3JQ
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed 1no. rear dormer and alterations to fenestration are lawful
-
26/01862/CLU Granted
Holyport Pre School Holyport Youth Club Moneyrow Green Holyport Maidenhead SL6 2NA
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the existing use of the site as a pre-school is lawful.