Planning application
The Gables Halls Lane Waltham St Lawrence Reading RG10 0JB
Permission granted. Work must normally begin within three years of the decision or the permission lapses.
Proposal
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed detached outbuilding ancillary to the main dwelling is lawful.
As published by the council, reference 20/02490/CPD
Application record
- Reference
- 20/02490/CPD
- Type
- Cert of Lawfulness of Proposed Dev
- Status
- Decided
- Decision
- Permitted Development
- Received
- 24 Sep 2020
- Validated
- 24 Sep 2020
- Decided
- 19 Nov 2020
- Ward
- Hurley And Walthams
- Parish
- Waltham St Lawrence Parish
- Decision by
- Delegated
- Postcode
- RG10 0JB
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
24 Sep 2020
Received by Windsor and Maidenhead
-
19 Nov 2020
Decision issued: Permitted Development
-
12 Sep 2026
Added to PlanIndex
Documents
Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report
10 documents on file for this application
A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.
Trade members open them from here.
Open the documentsWhat this grant of permission means
Windsor and Maidenhead granted permission on 19 November 2020, subject to any conditions on the decision notice. Work must normally begin within three years or the permission lapses. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.
About lawful development applications
A lawful development certificate is a legal determination that existing or proposed works do not need planning permission; the merits of the scheme are not considered. More in our guide to planning application types.
Nearby applications
Within 500 metres
-
Dingley Cottage Halls Lane Waltham St Lawrence Reading RG10 0JB
Pollard Apple tree
Granted Trees 11 docs -
Dingley Cottage Halls Lane Waltham St Lawrence Reading RG10 0JB
Details required by Condition 3 (fenestration) of planning permission 26/00359/FULL for a Single storey front extension, addition of masonry wall and a new roof to the existing single storey side extension, single storey rear extension to replace the existing conservatory and alterations to the fenestration and external finish, including the addition of a Beaumaris Bat Box and a Schwegler Woodcrete Nest Box.
Refused Conditions Extension Roofing +1 18 docsSmall domestic -
Dingley Cottage Halls Lane Waltham St Lawrence Reading RG10 0JB
93% historically approved · decision due ~23 Oct
Details required by Condition 3 (Window and Door details) of planning permission 26/00359/FULL for a single storey front extension, addition of masonry wall and a new roof to the existing single storey side extension, single storey rear extension to replace the existing conservatory and alterations to the fenestration and external finish, including the addition of a Beaumaris Bat Box and a Schwegler Woodcrete Nest Box.
Awaiting decision Conditions Extension Roofing +1 16 docsSmall domestic -
Dingley Cottage Halls Lane Waltham St Lawrence Reading RG10 0JB
Single storey front extension, addition of masonry wall and a new roof to the existing single storey side extension, single storey rear extension to replace the existing conservatory and alterations to the fenestration and external finish, including the addition of a Beaumaris Bat Box and a Schwegler Woodcrete Nest Box.
Granted Full applications Extension Roofing +1 24 docsSmall domestic -
Dingley Cottage And The Gables Halls Lane Waltham St Lawrence Reading
G1 - x2 Hazel , Holly and Yew - re-coppice Hazel, remove lowest growth from base to leave clear stem towards outhouse, fell dead Yew, T1 - Silver birch - remove lowest limb over garden back to source, G2 - Beech and Sycamore - remove crossing limb on Beech at crown break back to source, prune back lower canopy over garden by 1.5m, remove stem growth on Sycamore back to source up to crown break and prune back canopy over garden by 1m, T2 - Oak - remove major deadwood, G3 - Apple and Cherry - fell, T3 - Neighbouring Apple - prune lowest 3-4 branches back to fence line by 1.5m over garden to a final spread of 4.5-5m, T4 - Oak - remove lowest limb and dead limb back to source, T5 - Lime - prune lower canopy up to 8m back from drive by 1.5m, reduce over extended limb towards Oak by 2m, T6 - Beech - remove lowest limb over road back to source and lowest stem growth to crown break, crown reduction by 1.5m over road and towards lime tree as per photographs.
Granted Trees 15 docsSmall domestic -
Land At Roebuck And Cortina And Dingley Cottage And The Gables Halls Lane Waltham St Lawrence Reading
(T1) - Apple - crown lift to 3m within the main property boundary, prune secondary growth only. (T2) - Flowering Quince - reduce height to 1.8m. (T3) - Silver Birch - crown lift to 3.5m, removing secondary growth where possible. (T4) - Beech - crown lift to 3m over garden/driveway and to 4.5m over road by removing secondary growth only. (T5) - Lime - crown lift to 5m by removing secondary growth. (T6) - Oak - Crown lift to 5m removing secondary growth and removing deadwood. (G1) - crown lift trees within the boundary of The Gables to 5.5m and re-coppice 2no. Hazel.
Granted Trees 13 docs
Other lawful development applications
In Windsor and Maidenhead
-
26/01743/CPD Refused
1 Aston Mead Windsor SL4 5PW
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed replacement single storey rear extension is lawful.
-
26/01828/CPU Granted
Concorde Park Concorde Road Maidenhead SL6 4FJ
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether a private hire operators licence for taxi services is lawful.
-
26/01853/CPU Granted
20 Craufurd Rise Maidenhead SL6 7LS
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed use of a room on the ground floor as private hire operators licence is lawful.
-
26/01781/CPD Refused
163 Arthur Road Windsor SL4 1RZ
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed rear L shaped dormer with Juliet balcony and new air source heat pump are lawful.
-
26/01553/CLU Granted
64 Priors Way Maidenhead SL6 2EN
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the existing use of building as self-contained residential dwelling as per details set out in Statutory Declaration is lawful.