Planning application
52 Aldebury Road Maidenhead SL6 7HB
Permission granted. Work must normally begin within three years of the decision or the permission lapses.
Proposal
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed part garage conversion to form a shower room is lawful
As published by the council, reference 20/00701/CPD
Application record
- Reference
- 20/00701/CPD
- Type
- Cert of Lawfulness of Proposed Dev
- Status
- Decided
- Decision
- Granted As published: Permitted Development
- Received
- 16 Mar 2020
- Validated
- 16 Mar 2020
- Decided
- 21 Apr 2020
- Ward
- Furze Platt
- Parish
- Maidenhead Unparished
- Decision by
- Delegated
- Postcode
- SL6 7HB
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
16 Mar 2020
Received by Windsor and Maidenhead
-
21 Apr 2020
Decision issued: Permitted Development
-
12 Oct 2026
Added to PlanIndex
Documents
Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report
7 documents on file for this application
A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.
Watch members (£5 a month) open the document list from here.
Open the documentsWhat this grant of permission means
Windsor and Maidenhead granted permission on 21 April 2020, subject to any conditions on the decision notice. Work must normally begin within three years or the permission lapses. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.
About lawful development applications
A lawful development certificate is a legal determination that existing or proposed works do not need planning permission; the merits of the scheme are not considered. More in our guide to planning application types.
Nearby applications
Within 0.3 miles
-
5 Partridge Mead Maidenhead SL6 7HG
Part garage conversion, raising of the eaves above the existing single storey side element, single storey side infill/rear extension and alterations to fenestration, following demolition of the existing single storey rear element.
Granted Full applications Extension Demolition +1 7 docsSmall domestic -
1 Partridge Mead Maidenhead SL6 7HG
Single storey rear extension
Granted Full applications Extension 10 docsSmall domestic -
31 Aldebury Road Maidenhead SL6 7EY
Single storey rear extension no greater than 5.00m in depth, 3.315m high with an eaves height of 3.0m.
Granted Prior approval Extension 10 docsSmall domestic -
5 Partridge Mead Maidenhead SL6 7HG
Part garage conversion into habitable accommodation with new raised flat roof over garage and part new rear external wall, enclosure of side passageway to create accommodation and alterations to fenestration to include 2 No. rear rooflights.
Granted Full applications Loft or dormer Windows or glazing 8 docs -
9 Barn Close Maidenhead SL6 7HD
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the loft conversion is lawful.
Granted Lawful development Loft or dormer 7 docs -
9 Barn Close Maidenhead SL6 7HD
Single storey rear extension and x1 rear dormer.
Refused Full applications Extension Loft or dormer 22 docsSmall domestic
Other lawful development applications
In Windsor and Maidenhead
-
26/02222/CPD Refused
52 Audley Way Ascot SL5 8EF
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed single storey rear extension following the removal of the existing conservatory is lawful.
-
26/01954/CPD Withdrawn
Mulberry House Waltham Road Maidenhead SL6 3NH
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the single storey rear extension is lawful.
-
26/01856/CLU Granted
Apple Tree Cottage And Land Adjacent To Apple Tree Cottage Paley Street Maidenhead
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the existing use of the land as a residential garden incidental to the main dwelling is lawful
-
26/02022/CPD Refused
14 Church View White Waltham Maidenhead SL6 3JQ
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed 1no. rear dormer and alterations to fenestration are lawful
-
26/01862/CLU Granted
Holyport Pre School Holyport Youth Club Moneyrow Green Holyport Maidenhead SL6 2NA
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the existing use of the site as a pre-school is lawful.