Planning application
Hill View Cottage Hill View Road Wraysbury Staines TW19 5EQ
Refused. Only the applicant can appeal, within the statutory time limit, and a revised scheme can be submitted instead.
Proposal
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed conversion of the existing outbuilding to be used as living accommodation ancillary to the main house is lawful.
As published by the council, reference 20/00211/CPD
Application record
- Reference
- 20/00211/CPD
- Type
- Cert of Lawfulness of Proposed Dev
- Status
- Decided
- Decision
- Refused As published: Refuse
- Received
- 28 Jan 2020
- Validated
- 28 Jan 2020
- Decided
- 26 Mar 2020
- Ward
- Datchet Horton And Wraysbury
- Parish
- Wraysbury Parish
- Decision by
- Delegated
- Postcode
- TW19 5EQ
Site history
Applications at this address on the Windsor and Maidenhead register
This site has had 3 applications since 2020: 1 approved, 2 refused.
-
20/02780/FULL Granted
Hill View Cottage Hill View Road Wraysbury Staines TW19 5EQ
Replacement garage.
-
20/01651/FULL Refused
Hill View Cottage Hill View Road Wraysbury Staines TW19 5EQ
Replacement garage.
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
28 Jan 2020
Received by Windsor and Maidenhead
-
26 Mar 2020
Decision issued: Refuse
-
12 Oct 2026
Added to PlanIndex
Documents
Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report
7 documents on file for this application
A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.
Watch members (£5 a month) open the document list from here.
Open the documentsWhat this refusal means
Windsor and Maidenhead refused this application for the reasons on the decision notice; only the applicant can appeal, and refused schemes often return in revised form. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.
About lawful development applications
A lawful development certificate is a legal determination that existing or proposed works do not need planning permission; the merits of the scheme are not considered. More in our guide to planning application types.
Nearby applications
Within 0.3 miles
-
Hill View Cottage Hill View Road Wraysbury Staines TW19 5EQ
Replacement garage.
Refused Full applications 13 docs -
Hill View Cottage Hill View Road Wraysbury Staines TW19 5EQ
Replacement garage.
Granted Full applications 21 docs -
The Stack 3 Old Ferry Drive Wraysbury Staines TW19 5EH
Single storey rear extension no greater than 8.00m in depth, 3.65m high with an eaves height of 3.45m.
Granted Prior approval Extension 15 docsSmall domestic -
Little Orchard Hill View Road Wraysbury Staines TW19 5EQ
Single storey annexe
Refused Full applications 8 docsSmall domestic -
Wood End Hill View Road Wraysbury Staines TW19 5EQ
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed garage conversion is lawful.
Granted Lawful development 8 docs -
43 Welley Road Wraysbury Staines TW19 5DW
New garage following the demolition of the existing detached garage
Granted Full applications Demolition 12 docs
Other lawful development applications
In Windsor and Maidenhead
-
26/02222/CPD Refused
52 Audley Way Ascot SL5 8EF
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed single storey rear extension following the removal of the existing conservatory is lawful.
-
26/01954/CPD Withdrawn
Mulberry House Waltham Road Maidenhead SL6 3NH
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the single storey rear extension is lawful.
-
26/01856/CLU Granted
Apple Tree Cottage And Land Adjacent To Apple Tree Cottage Paley Street Maidenhead
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the existing use of the land as a residential garden incidental to the main dwelling is lawful
-
26/02022/CPD Refused
14 Church View White Waltham Maidenhead SL6 3JQ
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed 1no. rear dormer and alterations to fenestration are lawful
-
26/01862/CLU Granted
Holyport Pre School Holyport Youth Club Moneyrow Green Holyport Maidenhead SL6 2NA
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the existing use of the site as a pre-school is lawful.