Planning application
21/01751/TPO
11 The Hall Way Littleton SO22 6QL
Proposal
Lime Tree TPO 1474T5, crown lifted ~10 years ago and has now grown to a substantial size over hanging half my lawned garden and into the public car park of the Littleton Memorial Hall. The arborist (Hampshire Heartwood) recommend pollarding the tree due to size. This will bring it in line with other lime trees in this road that have been pollarded by other owners.
As published by the council, reference 21/01751/TPO
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
28 Jun 2021
Received by Winchester
-
7 Sep 2021
Decision issued: Application Permitted
-
28 Jul 2026
Added to PlanIndex
What a grant of permission means
The process from here
Permission has been granted, usually subject to conditions listed on the decision notice, some of which must be discharged before work starts. The decision notice on the council portal sets out exactly what was approved.
Work must normally begin within three years of the decision or the permission lapses. Neighbours cannot appeal a grant; challenging one means judicial review of how the decision was made, within tight time limits.
About trees applications
How this application type works
Tree applications cover work to protected trees: those under a tree preservation order need consent for pruning or felling, and trees in a conservation area need six weeks written notice before work starts. The council assesses the amenity value of the tree and can refuse consent, approve it with conditions, or in conservation areas make a preservation order in response.
Nearby applications
Within 500 metres
-
26/01366/TPO Awaiting decision
14 The Hall Way Littleton Winchester Hampshire SO22 6QL
T1- Lime - Repollard back to previous points. Works form part of ongoing maintenance to the tree.
-
21/02311/HOU Granted
14 The Hall Way Littleton SO22 6QL
Single storey rear extension to replace existing conservatory and associated alterations
-
21/02100/TPO Granted
15 The Hall Way Littleton SO22 6QL
Connifer (Chamaecyparis) shown on WWC public view map as only tree in the garden of 15 The Hall Way. We would like to fell the tree on account of its close proximity to (and towering over) our home. We believe that there is a serious risk of it falling or breaking, particularly with the high wind and lack of shelter, onto our home causing damage and potential risk of serious injury/ loss of life to the occupants. We are in the process of redeveloping our garden and have already planted 2 trees at the boundary- ie away from the house. We are happy to replant a tree, to replace the conifer, which is of less risk to our property and more in-keeping with the location. Mr McIndoe has made some suggestions (see attached tree report) but we are happy to be guided by the tree officer.
-
25/02452/PNHOU Granted
5 Hollands Close Littleton Winchester Hampshire SO22 6QN
Proposed single storey rear extension with facing brick walls to match the existing property and flat roof construction.
-
22/02569/HOU Granted
10 Pitter Close Littleton Hampshire SO22 6PD
Single storey rear extension
-
21/01555/HOU Granted
Landacre Fairclose Drive Littleton SO22 6QW
Proposed replacement conservatory to the side of property.
Other trees applications
In Winchester
-
26/01203/TPO Granted
21 Shepherds Down Alresford Hampshire SO24 9PP
G1 Sycamore - Crown lift trees up to 4/5m on branch ends to lift over driveway & footpath. Remove epicormic growth
-
26/01281/TPO Granted
Tall Trees Peach Hill Lane Crawley Winchester Hampshire SO21 2PZ
T6 - Yew tree Height 18m to reduce to no less than 15m, radial spread 11m to reduce to no less than 8m. Arboricultural Justification: To undertake a sympathetic crown reduction in accordance with BS3998:2010 to maintain the tree at a sustainable size relative to its growing environment and reducxe end-weight thoughout the crown. The works will lessen mechanical loading on extnded limbs, improve the tree's long-term structural integrity, and reduce the liklihood of branch failure during adverse weather conditions. The propsoed reduction will retain the tree's natural form and amenity value whilst establishing an appropriate management cycle for this mature specimen. T7 - Sycamore to take back to source the first 4no branches at 35mm stem diameter Arboricultural Justification: To remove four small lower branches by pruning bak to source. The works are minor in nature and intended to improve canopy structure and provide appropriate clearance beneath the crown. The proposed pruning involves the removal of small diameter branches only and will not adversely affect the health or stability of the tree. (Amended)
-
26/01520/TPC Awaiting decision
73 Upper Brook Street Winchester Hampshire SO23 8DG
T1- Magnolia grandiflora - Fell to ground level. Alternative management options have been considered but are not suitable due to the tree's condition and/or the management objectives. Removal to ground level is considered the most appropriate course of action.
-
26/01515/TPC Awaiting decision
The Garden House Haig Road Alresford Hampshire SO24 9LX
T1- Tulip Tree - Reduce the lateral canopy spread by up to 3 m (governed by suitable pruning points) to maintain an appropriate clearance from adjacent buildings while retaining the tree's natural form and balanced crown structure. These works form part of the ongoing arboricultural management of the tree and are intended to maintain its size, structure and long-term health within the garden setting.
-
26/01513/TPO Awaiting decision
Currawong George Eyston Drive Winchester Hampshire SO22 4PE
T1-T5 Beech - All 5 trees have extensive squirrel damage in upper limbs and branches. These are now posing a safety hazard to the owners & neighbours. Suggestion is to shorten damaged limbs and branches as appropriate to their lengths and amount of damage to reduce the risk of failure. Estimated reduction is maximum 3m but less if safe to do so & leaving decent growth points. 1 limb recently broke & fell into owners garden & the climbing inspection was undertaken & the damage was highlighted.