Skip to content
PlanIndex Get alerts
Menu

Planning application

11 Heathview Gardens SW15 3SZ

Granted Wandsworth 2026/0917

Works: Trees

Permission granted. Work must normally begin within three years of the decision or the permission lapses.

Proposal

TPO 6/1969 G1 X4 Lime tree: Reduce by 2m back to previous points of reduction G2 X4 Lime tree: Reduce by 2m back to previous points of reduction Routine Maintenance

As published by the council, reference 2026/0917

Application record

Reference
2026/0917
Status
Granted As published: FINAL DECISION
Decision
Granted As published: Approve with Conditions
Received
10 Jul 2026
Postcode
SW15 3SZ

Timeline

Dates from the published record

  1. 10 Jul 2026

    Received by Wandsworth

  2. 29 Jul 2026

    Added to PlanIndex

What this grant of permission means

Wandsworth granted permission, subject to any conditions on the decision notice. Work must normally begin within three years or the permission lapses. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.

About this record

The published feed does not state which type of application this is; the register entry on Wandsworth's portal will say. Our guide explains the common types.

Nearby applications

Within 0.3 miles

  • 2 Heathview Gardens SW15 3SZ

    2026/0744 Submitted 23 Feb 2026 50 yards away

    88% historically approved · decision due ~20 Apr

    TG1- 2x Himalayan birch, 8m high and 6m wide. These trees are becoming to large for the area they have been planted in, the roots are starting to grow against the drive and we are worried about future damage, we would like to remove the trees in order that something more suitable could be planted.

    Awaiting decision Trees
  • 6 Heathview Gardens London Wandsworth SW15 3SZ

    2026/1143 Submitted 23 Mar 2026 50 yards away

    88% historically approved · decision due ~18 May

    T1 - London Plane - Reduce crown by approx. 2-3m in order to take new re-growth back to previous pollard points. Remove all epicormic growth and major dead wood. Justification - This tree appears to have been historically pollarded, with significant secondary regrowth now developing beyond the previous pollard heads. Returning the crown to these established pollard points will maintain the tree within its historical management regime, preventing excessive limb extension and reducing the risk of structural weakness associated with long, end-weighted regrowth. T2 - Large Yew tree - Lift all lower growth to a minimum of 10ft. Justification - Crown lifting will improve clearance within the garden and around adjacent planting, while retaining the tree???s natural form and canopy structure. The works are limited and sympathetic, removing only the lowest growth to improve accessibility, usability of the garden space, and light penetration, without adversely affecting the long-term health or amenity value of the tree. T3 - Lime tree - Fell to ground level. Justification - The lime tree is of poor form and overall low visual quality, with extensive epicormic growth, basal suckering and unstructured regrowth throughout the canopy. This indicates ongoing stress and a lack of long term structural integrity. The tree is poorly positioned within the garden, limiting its suitability for retention and conflicting with the intended layout and use of the space. It does not contribute positively to the setting and is not in keeping with the overall garden design. There is ample alternative tree cover within the surrounding area, and the removal of this specimen would not result in any significant loss of amenity or canopy value. For these reasons, removal of the tree is considered justified and appropriate. T4 - Lime tree - Reduce crown by approx. 30% taking all new re growth back to previous reduction points and strip all epicormic growth and major dead wood. Justification - Given the tree???s very close proximity to the property, its size may pose ongoing management issues including excessive shading, debris accumulation, and potential structural concerns. Removal may be considered to mitigate these issues where continued reduction pruning would otherwise be required on a frequent cycle.

    Awaiting decision Trees
  • 5 Heathview Gardens SW15

    2011/4421 Submitted 11 Oct 2011 50 yards away

    Details of materials, tree protection and Arboricultural method statement pursuant to conditions 2, 3 and 7 o planning permission dated 14/02/2011 ref 2010/5467 (Demolition of single-storey side and rear extensions. Erection of single-storey rear extension with first floor balcony and excavation of basement together with alterations including works to trees).

    Withdrawn Full applications Extension Demolition +1 2 docs
    Small domestic
  • 4 Heathview Gardens SW15 3SZ

    2024/3111 Submitted 10 Sep 2024 50 yards away

    T7 - Oak: Crown reduce 2m all around and remove crossing or rubbing branches (minor). T8 - Acer campestre: Crown reduce 1m all around.

    Decided Trees 7 docs
  • 6 Heathview Gardens SW15 3SZ

    2026/1202 Submitted 23 Mar 2026 50 yards away

    88% historically approved · decision due ~18 May

    T1 - London Plane - Reduce crown by approx. 2-3m in order to take new re-growth back to previous pollard points. Remove all epicormic growth and major dead wood. Justification - This tree appears to have been historically pollarded, with significant secondary regrowth now developing beyond the previous pollard heads. Returning the crown to these established pollard points will maintain the tree within its historical management regime, preventing excessive limb extension and reducing the risk of structural weakness associated with long, end-weighted regrowth. T2 - Large Yew tree - Lift all lower growth to a minimum of 10ft. Justification - Crown lifting will improve clearance within the garden and around adjacent planting, while retaining the tree???s natural form and canopy structure. The works are limited and sympathetic, removing only the lowest growth to improve accessibility, usability of the garden space, and light penetration, without adversely affecting the long-term health or amenity value of the tree. T3 - Lime tree - Fell to ground level. Justification - The lime tree is of poor form and overall low visual quality, with extensive epicormic growth, basal suckering and unstructured regrowth throughout the canopy. This indicates ongoing stress and a lack of long term structural integrity. The tree is poorly positioned within the garden, limiting its suitability for retention and conflicting with the intended layout and use of the space. It does not contribute positively to the setting and is not in keeping with the overall garden design. There is ample alternative tree cover within the surrounding area, and the removal of this specimen would not result in any significant loss of amenity or canopy value. For these reasons, removal of the tree is considered justified and appropriate. T4 - Lime tree - Reduce crown by approx. 30% taking all new re growth back to previous reduction points and strip all epicormic growth and major dead wood. Justification - Given th

    Awaiting decision Trees
  • 6 Heathview Gardens SW15 3SZ

    2019/4770 Submitted 4 Nov 2019 50 yards away

    Erection of replacement part rear/side boundary wall.

    Granted Householder 4 docs
    Small domestic