Planning application
3 Warborough Road Brixham Devon TQ5 0JY
Works: Demolition Small domestic
Read from the description, not a valuation. How we read the register
Withdrawn before a decision, so it carries no planning weight. A revised scheme can be submitted at any time.
Proposal
Demolition of attached garage and formation of single storey extentions to front and rear; formation of new detached double garage and workshop.
As published by the council, reference P/2011/0025
Application record
- Reference
- P/2011/0025
- Type
- Householder Application
- Status
- Decided
- Decision
- Withdrawn As published: Application Withdrawn
- Received
- 13 Jan 2011
- Validated
- 13 Jan 2011
- Decided
- 15 Mar 2011
- Ward
- Churston With Galmpton
- Decision by
- Delegated
- Postcode
- TQ5 0JY
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
13 Jan 2011
Received by Torbay
-
15 Mar 2011
Decision issued: Application Withdrawn
-
1 Aug 2026
Added to PlanIndex
Who's behind it
Company information only, from the register and Companies House
Wolstenholme Limited Agent, registered in Chinnor
Active · incorporated 2008 · Chinnor
66 applications on PlanIndex · across 6 councils · 85% granted
Trade members see everything this firm has filed, how it was decided, and get an email the day it files again.
See their track recordDocuments
Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report
10 documents on file for this application
A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.
Watch members (£5 a month) open the document list from here.
Open the documentsWhat withdrawal means
The applicant withdrew this application before Torbay decided it, and is free to submit a revised scheme at any time. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.
About householder applications
Householder applications cover work to an existing house and its garden, such as extensions, lofts and outbuildings, and cannot create a separate dwelling or change what the building is used for. More in our guide to planning application types.
Nearby applications
Within 0.3 miles
-
Greenhaze 25 Warborough Road Brixham TQ5 0JY
Requesting cyclical permission to re-pollard T1 Lime and G1 group of 12 Holme Oaks. Prior to having TPO's placed on them recently, these trees have been historically managed by pollarding, which kept them healthy and safe while encouraging new growth from the existing pollard points. Requesting cyclical permission to re-reduce G2 Field Maples - again these have been historically managed in this way to maintain the condition of the trees. Requesting cyclical permission to re-reduce T2 Sycamore - this has also been historically managed in this way to maintain its condition. Fell T3 and T4 due to dieback in the crown. These Pines are in close proximity to high value/risk targets in terms of property and public footpaths.
Granted Trees -
Graylings Bascombe Road Brixham TQ5 0JX
88% historically approved · decision due ~26 Jun
First floor extension to front with Juliet balcony, increase size and shape to front dormer, open porch to front door, changes to window type/materials, mulitple roof lights to rear roof, alterations to existing rear extension, windows and doors.
Awaiting decision Householder Extension Loft or dormer +2Small domestic -
Graylings Bascombe Road Brixham TQ5 0JX
T001 - 1 x Copper beech (Fagus sylvatica purpurea) - Reduce to tree in height from 13m to 11m not exceeding wounds of 75mm, and radial crown spread from 6.5m to 5m not exceeding wounds of 75mm. Crown raise tree to give a maximum clearance of 2.5 metres from the property. Justification for works - The tree has been reduced historically and has responded well resulting in limited amenity loss and a better relationship between tree and property.
Refused Trees -
Graylings Bascombe Road Brixham TQ5 0JX
T001 Copper beech (Fagus sylvatica purpurea) - Sectionally dismantle and fell. T001 is situated approximately 1.2 metres from the dwelling, with 6?7 metres of canopy overhang, resulting in physical interference with the building, retaining wall damage consistent with root expansion, shading of habitable rooms, and ongoing maintenance burden . Although assessed as a tolerable risk, its retention would require repeated pruning that is considered unsustainable and likely to compromise its long-term form . The report also notes that the tree?s public visibility and wider amenity value are limited, with substantial surrounding tree cover maintaining local character . Replacement planting in a more suitable location within the garden is recommended , ensuring continued tree cover without the existing structural conflict or adverse impact on the enjoyment of the property.
Withdrawn TreesDomestic -
Graylings Bascombe Road Brixham TQ5 0JX
79% historically approved · decision due ~2 Nov
Tree ID: T1 - Beech (Copper Beech) as identified under the Modified Schedule of TPO 2025.005. Proposed Work: Sectional dismantle to ground level and reinstate 1x Ginkgo biloba standard at the southern end of the grounds as indicated on the attached sketch plan. Reasons for Work: Incompatible Spatial Relationship & Mutually Agreed Pruning Failure: The main stem of this 50ft tree stands within a critical 1.2 metres of the residential property, overhanging the building ridge line by 6-7 metres. In Case AT/2026/0070 (Page 2-3, Sec 8, 11), the Council's Tree Officer explicitly ruled that the pruning works required to achieve safe, long-term structural clearance from the roof would remove over 30% of the leaf-bearing volume, risk fatal 'sun scorch damage' to this thin-barked species, and invite decay. Because the physical proximity to the house is absolute, and the council formally agrees that the pruning required to clear the building is physiologically destructive to the asset, long-term retention under BS 3998 is entirely unviable. Arithmetic Defect in Standalone Amenity Scoring (True Score: 14):The TPO was confirmed subject to modifications on 12th December 2025, legally isolating the Beech tree as 'T1'. The collective evaluation score was benchmarked at the absolute minimum threshold of 15 for each property, but inflated by artificially combining data across two properties where the protected trees on each site are situated some 200 feet apart. In the confirmation report (Page 3), the council explicitly accepted the applicant's formal objection regarding local tree density and issued a 1-point reduction (-1) to the category score. Because the modified order must protect T1 on its standalone merits, its true standalone arithmetic score is 14. Torbay Council's local framework dictates a minimum score of 15 to justify a TPO. T1 falls below the threshold and its ongoing retention is procedurally unjustified. Minimal Public Landscape Contribution: Situated ......
Awaiting decision Trees -
Broadwaters Bascombe Road Brixham TQ5 0JX
T1 - Mature Lime tree on the Northern boundary of the garden. Application to fell the Lime and replant with smaller species trees.
Refused Trees 5 docs
Other householder applications
In Torbay
-
P/2026/0476 Granted
75 North View Road Brixham TQ5 9TS
Roof conversion with installation of rooflights to front and construction of a rear dormer.
-
P/2026/0474 Granted
50 Westhill Avenue Torquay TQ1 4LQ
Installation of tiered patio, to replace existing raised patio to rear.
-
P/2026/0585 Awaiting decision
12 Barcombe Road Paignton TQ3 1PY
Formation of first floor extension to front.
-
P/2026/0586 Awaiting decision
2 Helford Drive Paignton TQ4 7NJ
Formation of single-storey side & rear extension with partial demolition of existing conservatory.
-
P/2026/0441 Granted
16 Sanders Road Brixham TQ5 8PL
Demolition of existing conservatory, formation of single-storey side & rear extensions, raising flat roof sections by 200mm, installation of 2no. rooflights and construction of 2no. decked areas.