Skip to content
PlanIndex Get alerts
Menu

Planning application

Highlands and Charnwood House, Station Road & Reading Road, Lower Shiplake

Granted South Oxfordshire P18/S4893/TPO Works to TPO

Works: Trees

Permission granted. Work must normally begin within three years of the decision or the permission lapses.

Proposal

G1 - 2 x Douglas Fir trees at the rear - reduce to ground level. Reason: both trees are suppressing adjacent Beech tree canopy, removal with enhance Beech tree growth. T1 - 1 x Beech tree at the rear - reduce 3 x lowest limbs over garden back to source. Reason: to encourage light below the canopy to allow lower shrubs to grow. T2 - 1 x Dying Conifer at the rear - reduce to ground level. T3 - 1 x Douglas Fir at the rear - reduce to ground level. Reason: This tree is suppressed by adjacent tree and has little amenity value. T4 - 1 x Sweet Chestnut at the rear - reduce to ground level. Reason: tree is leaning towards road and has no amenity value. G1 8 Fir, 3 Lawson Cypress, 1 Lime, 1 Sweet Chestnut Spec: S15 Fell tree to ground level. T1 Beech Spec: S1 Reduce 3 lowest branches over garden back to source T2 Fir Spec: S15 Fell tree to ground level.

As published by the council, reference P18/S4893/TPO

Application record

Reference
P18/S4893/TPO
Type
Works to TPO
Status
Decision Made
Decision
Granted As published: Consent TPO works
Received
23 Jan 2018
Validated
23 Jan 2018
Decided
6 Mar 2018

Site history

Applications at this address on the South Oxfordshire register

This site has had 2 applications since 2017: 2 approved, 0 refused.

  • P17/S5058/TPO Granted

    Highlands and Charnwood House, Station Road & Reading Road, Lower Shiplake

    T1 - Cedar - this is the larger of the two trees that together, form a communal crown. Ground level external visual inspection of the base and root plate area show nothing of note. From the ground based observation numerous splits and torn out branches were noted. Major structural unions also exhibit signs of swelling and bulging associated with internal fractures, hazard beams and torsional splits typical in certain typres of Cedar of which these are possibly cultivars with inherent genetic weakness. The overall form noted from the ground based indicates the loss of the leader historically. During the climbing inspection to look at structural condition more closely, in order to gauge the nature of defects, it was observed that the leader had been lost historically, and the subsequent regrowth has led to a multileader form with a poor union that has attempted to fuse above the previous failure point. Integrity of the fusion could not be gauged although given its size and age of the failure; it is assumed the fusion is sound. Throughout the climbing inspection numerous split unions, tear out wounds and historically failed branches were observed throughout the canopy, although no meaningful remedial work has been carried out to mitigate these breakages. Some historical work indicated excessive internal thinning in places. The climbing inspection has shown that the crown has good vitality throughout with expected future levels of yearly extension growth. Option 1: Carry out canopy reduction with the goal being to create an even taper and end weight reduction of all over developed limbs by approximately 2-3m on selected laterals, with other laterals reduced by 1.0m to achieve crown balance. Option 2: Carry out dynamic non-invasive bracing of upper leaders to assist natural fusion of poor union. T2 - Cedar - The smaller of the two trees that form a communal crown. A ground level visual inspection of the base and root plate area show nothing of note. From a ground based observation, numerous splits and torn out branches were observed. Major structural unions also exhibit signs of swelling and bulging associated with internal fractures, hazard beams and torsional splits typical of certain types of Cedars, of which these are possibly cultivars with inherent genetic weakness. Also noted during the ground based inspection is multi leader form that is potentially either caused by loss of leader through inclement weather or historical pruning works. Upon carrying out the climbing inspection it was noted, much like its sister tree, that there are numerous defects such as torn out branches at unions, hazard beams and spiral fractures. The multi-leader form shows no sign of what caused this growth habit. All unions appeared sound and stable. Carry out canopy reduction with the goal being to create even taper and end weight reduction of all overdeveloped limbs by approximately 2-3m on selected lateals with other laterals reduced by 1.0m to achieve crown balance. G5 2 Cedar of Lebanon Spec: S1 T1 and T2 Please see recommended works in application. Spec: S19 Please add the following at the end of all the aprroved works: All pruning cuts must be made at bra Reason: R1 Sound arboricultural management Reason: R2 To ensure future compatibility with site, surroundings and usage

    Decided 21 Sep 2017 Trees

Timeline

Dates from the published record

  1. 23 Jan 2018

    Received by South Oxfordshire

  2. 6 Mar 2018

    Decision issued: Consent TPO works

  3. 15 Aug 2026

    Added to PlanIndex

What this grant of permission means

South Oxfordshire granted permission on 6 March 2018, subject to any conditions on the decision notice. Work must normally begin within three years or the permission lapses. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.

About tree works applications

Applications for works to trees cover protected trees: consent under a tree preservation order, or six weeks notice for trees in a conservation area. More in our guide to planning application types.

In South Oxfordshire

  • P26/S3948/TCA Decided

    Iden House Bakers Lane Brightwell-cum-sotwell Wallingford OX10 0PY

    T1 poplar fell to ground, due to the proximity to neighbouring properties and a concern from the homeowner regarding the overall size of the tree

    Received 4 Sep, published by the council 8 Sep 2026 Trees
  • P26/S3921/TCA Decided

    Riverside House Waterstock Oxford OX33 1JT

    Willow, fallen stem, Fell. Ash, a group of 3, dead fell. Birch, dead, a group of 2 trees, Fell Ash, Class 3 Ash Dieback, Fell Sycamore, dead Fell.

    Received 3 Sep, published by the council 8 Sep 2026 Trees
  • P26/S3346/TPO Granted

    The Maples Woodlands Road Harpsden Henley-on-thames RG9 4AA

    T13 - Walnut. Ideally remove part of the tree, however possible fell

    Received 4 Aug, published by the council 15 Aug 2026 Trees
  • P26/S3237/TPO Granted

    30 Barlow Close Wheatley Oxford OX33 1NL

    T10 - pollard back to knuckle T9 - fell remaining 4m stump to ground. T8 - pollard back to knuckle T7 - pollard back to knuckle T6 - N/A - now felled to the ground as per previous application T5 - pollard back to knuckle T4 - pollard back to knuckle T3 - pollard back to knuckle T2 - fell remaining 3m stump to ground T1 - N/A - (for reference only, refers to Ash outside of our boundary line)

    Received 28 Jul, published by the council 15 Aug 2026 Trees
  • P26/S4130/TPO Decided

    48 Bridle Path Woodcote Reading RG8 0SE

    T1 reduce lateral spread on 3 ash trees by 3 metres that overhangs 48 bridal pathwoodcote. T2 reduce lateral spread on 2 oak trees by 3 metres that overhangs 48 bridal path woodcote.

    Received 15 Sep, published by the council 18 Sep 2026 Trees