Skip to content
PlanIndex Get alerts
Menu

Planning application

46 Marlborough Rise Aston 0046

Refused Rotherham RB2016/1694

Works: Extension Small domestic

Read from the description, not a valuation. How we read the register

Refused. Only the applicant can appeal, within the statutory time limit, and a revised scheme can be submitted instead.

Proposal

Single storey rear extension

As published by the council, reference RB2016/1694

Application record

Reference
RB2016/1694
Status
Dec
Decision
REFUSED
Received
14 Dec 2016
Validated
13 Jan 2017
Decided
8 Mar 2017
Ward
Holderness
Parish
Aston Cum Aughton
Decision by
Delegated (Part 2A)

Timeline

Dates from the published record

  1. 14 Dec 2016

    Received by Rotherham

  2. 13 Jan 2017

    Validated

    Checked as complete and ready for consideration.

  3. 8 Mar 2017

    Decision issued: REFUSED

  4. 22 Jul 2026

    Added to PlanIndex

Documents

Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report

14 documents on file for this application

A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.

Trade members open them from here.

Open the documents

What this refusal means

Rotherham refused this application for the reasons on the decision notice; only the applicant can appeal, and refused schemes often return in revised form. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.

About this record

The published feed does not state which type of application this is; the register entry on Rotherham's portal will say. Our guide explains the common types.