1 Clare Valley Nottingham Nottingham City NG7 1BU

1. 13 Aug 2026

   Received by Nottingham

2. 26 Aug 2026

   Added to PlanIndex

3. 9 Oct 2026

   Status changed to Decided

   Previously Pending Consideration.

• Application: 25/00580/PFUL3 (Decided)

Nottingham has decided this application; the outcome above is the register's own wording and the decision notice on the council portal carries the detail. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.

The published feed does not state which type of application this is; the register entry on Nottingham's portal will say. Our guide explains the common types.

• The Spinney Clare Valley Nottingham NG7 1BU

  26/01174/PTPO Submitted 2 Jul 2026 50 yards away

  Pollard 1 Lime Trees to a height of 4 metres. Reason: To repeat the pollarding cycle as per previous years. Trees are protected under: TPO1 W1

  Granted Trees 1 doc

• The Chestnuts Clare Valley Nottingham NG7 1BU

  26/01178/PTPO Submitted 1 Jul 2026 50 yards away

  Pollard 5 Lime Trees to a height of 4 metres. Reason: To repeat the pollarding cycle as per previous years. Trees are protected under: TPO1 W1

  Granted Trees 1 doc

• The Chestnuts Clare Valley Nottingham NG7 1BU

  26/01382/PWC Submitted 1 Jul 2026 50 yards away

  94% historically approved · decision due ~26 Aug

  Beech tree - crown lift to 4 metres.

  Awaiting decision Trees 1 doc

• Evergreen Clare Valley Nottingham Nottingham City NG7 1BU

  24/01535/PTPO Submitted 5 Sep 2024 50 yards away

  T1 - Lime - Fell - Crown has partially died off, substantial deadwood present within high risk area of properties. Remaining crown showing substantial die back . Suspect Kretzschmaria deusta.

  Granted Trees 2 docs

• 5 Clare Valley Nottingham Nottingham City NG7 1BU

  23/01122/PTPO Submitted 27 Jun 2023 50 yards away

  T1 - Copper Beech - due to its overall size, location, proximity to surrounding properties and my clients wish for more natural light entering the property we propose a crown reduction of approx 2.5-3m, along with lifting the crown to 7m above ground level, and a crown thin of 15% (which will also encompass the branches being removed for the reduction) T2 - Oak - this specimen actually resides on park estate land which is adjacent to #5, the tree has previously been pruned under concerns about its proximity to the building, the pruning works are inconstant and poor and barely fix the concerns raised. We propose a crown lifting to 7m above ground level, a crown thinning of 15%, a crown reduction of approx 2m and a proximity prune to provide 3m clearance away from the main building

  Granted Trees 2 docs

• 3 Clare Valley Nottingham Nottingham City NG7 1BU

  23/01123/PWC Submitted 27 Jun 2023 50 yards away

  T1 - Horse Chestnut - Given the trees overall size within what is essentially a small garden in comparison and the close proximity to adjacent properties there is a combined agreement and wanting between #3,4,5 Clare Valley and #3 Tattershall Drive that they wish the tree to be removed on the grounds of its over bearing nature in its environment to allow more light into the properties and gardens and to help alleviate damp and darkness inside the properties. The tree has previously been pollarded and not been shown any attention in the years preceding the works, no aerial inspection has taken place but water staining can been seen around the main pollard point indicating a bowl at the unions and a possible cavity. The bending stresses on a pollarded union are much higher than of a stem formed from sapling growth as they inherently have weaker fibre bonds due to the nature in which they grown from the cut stem and from growth nodes around the cut site. A tree is most within its safety factor when one canopy occupies many branches and one main stem, the more stems there are there is an increased risk of failure due to higher sail age in the canopy and timber weight, this is exaggerated more so if the main stem is beginning to hollow around the union site, with this information and the overall age of the specimen being in the 50-60 year category it is of higher risk of failure due to its structure and age and in the target area poses a hazard to its surroundings if failure occurs.

  Decided Trees 2 docs