2 Harrison Street Newcastle Under Lyme Staffordshire ST5 1NH

1. 27 May 2026

   Validated

   Checked as complete and ready for consideration.

2. 25 Jun 2026

   Decision issued: Permit

3. 22 Jul 2026

   Added to PlanIndex

Newcastle-under-Lyme granted permission on 25 June 2026, subject to any conditions on the decision notice. Work must normally begin within three years or the permission lapses. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.

The published feed does not state which type of application this is; the register entry on Newcastle-under-Lyme's portal will say. Our guide explains the common types.

• 2 Harrison Street Newcastle Staffs ST5 1NH

  02/00757/FUL Submitted 11 Sep 2002 50 yards away

  Two storey side extension

  Granted Full applications Extension

• 18 Occupation Street Newcastle Staffs ST5 1NQ

  04/00428/FUL Submitted 20 Apr 2004 50 yards away

  Single storey side/rear extension to form ancillary accommodation

  Granted Full applications Extension
  Small domestic

• C E Jones And Son 7 Victoria Street Newcastle Staffs ST5 1NU

  04/00960/FUL Submitted 3 Sep 2004 100 yards away

  Demolition of existing house and erection of seven 2 storey houses

  Refused Full applications Demolition

• The Cherry Tree London Road Newcastle Staffs ST5 1NZ

  02/00694/ADV Submitted 21 Aug 2002 100 yards away

  Various advertisements including post mounted sign, fascia and wall mounted signs

  Granted Advertising

• The Cherry Tree London Road Newcastle Under Lyme Staffordshire ST5 1NZ

  26/00589/TWA Submitted 14 Aug 2026 100 yards away

  TWO LARGE BEECH TREES ON A ISLAND BED CROWN LIFT TO 4.5M

  Granted Trees

• The Cherry Tree London Road Newcastle Staffordshire ST5 1NZ

  26/00757/TWA Submitted 19 Oct 2026 100 yards away

  93% historically approved · decision due ~14 Dec

  T1 Lime Removal. On the grounds that the tree is causing damage to the neighbouring wall and is physically encroaching into a residents garden. These issues raise concerns regarding the protection of neighbouring property, the ongoing impact on the residents enjoyment and use of their garden, and the potential for further damage if the tree is retained. The trees proximity to the boundary and its apparent impact on the neighbouring wall suggest that its continued retention may be causing an unreasonable level of interference with the adjacent property. If the damage is ongoing, retaining the tree could result in further deterioration and increased repair costs. Removal would eliminate the source of the encroachment and allow the affected wall and boundary area to be repaired and maintained without continued interference from the tree. Furthermore, the trees encroachment into a residents garden affects the residents ability to enjoy and use their outdoor space without obstruction. The impact on neighbouring amenity and property should therefore be given due consideration when assessing whether the tree remains suitable for retention in its current location. On balance, removal of T1 Lime should be considered a reasonable and proportionate solution, subject to confirmation of the damage, the extent of the encroachment and an assessment of any alternative management options. Where the damage cannot be adequately resolved through pruning or other arboricultural measures, removal may be the most effective long-term means of preventing further interference with the neighbouring property.

  Awaiting decision Trees