Planning application
HILLCREST COURT, BROWNHILL ROAD, LONDON, SE6 1AH
Works: Trees
Withdrawn before a decision, so it carries no planning weight. A revised scheme can be submitted at any time.
Proposal
The London Borough of Lewisham (Hillcrest Court 301-303 Brownhill Road London SE6) Tree Preservation Order 2002. Made: 30/05/2002
As published by the council, reference DC/23/130736
Application record
- Reference
- DC/23/130736
- Type
- Confirmed Tree Preservation Order
- Status
- Withdrawn
- Decision
- Closed internally
- Received
- 9 Mar 2023
- Decided
- 9 Mar 2023
- Ward
- Hither Green
- Postcode
- SE6 1AH
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
9 Mar 2023
Received by Lewisham
-
9 Mar 2023
Decision issued: Closed internally
-
7 Oct 2026
Added to PlanIndex
Documents
Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report
1 document on file for this application
A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.
Watch members (£5 a month) open the document list from here.
Open the documentsWhat withdrawal means
The applicant withdrew this application before Lewisham decided it, and is free to submit a revised scheme at any time. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.
About tree works applications
Applications for works to trees cover protected trees: consent under a tree preservation order, or six weeks notice for trees in a conservation area. More in our guide to planning application types.
Nearby applications
Within 0.3 miles
-
312 BROWNHILL ROAD, LONDON, SE6 1AX
The construction of part one, part two, storey rear extensions and a rear roof extensions at 312 Brownhill Road, SE6, in connection with the conversion of the property into 5 self-contained flats 4 x 1-bedroom flats, 1 x 3 bedroom flat. Together with elevational and fenestration alterations, hard and soft landscaping and the provision of 3 car parking spaces, cycle and refuse storage in the front driveway.
Refused Full applications New dwelling Extension +1 37 docs -
46 TORRIDON ROAD, LONDON, SE6 1AQ
87% historically approved · decision due ~14 Dec
Installation of a vehicular crossover to the front of 46 Torridon Road SE6.
Awaiting decision -
17 TORRIDON ROAD, LONDON, SE6 1AQ
87% historically approved · decision due ~13 Nov
Replacement of the existing windows and doors with new double glazed uPVC windows on all elevatio...
Awaiting decision Windows or glazing -
14 TORRIDON ROAD, LONDON, SE6 1AQ
87% historically approved · decision due ~20 Nov
Replacement of existing windows and doors on the front and rear elevations of the property with n...
Awaiting decision Windows or glazing -
22 TORRIDON ROAD, LONDON, SE6 1AQ
87% historically approved · decision due ~6 Oct
Demolition of the existing substation and the construction of a detached part-one storey, part tw...
Decided Demolition 30 docs -
24 TORRIDON ROAD, LONDON, SE6 1AQ
Certificate of Lawful Development (Proposed) in respect of the construction of a hip to gable roof extension and a rear dormer extension at 24 Torridon Road SE6, together with the installation of roof lights in the front roof slope.
Granted Lawful development Extension Loft or dormer 4 docs
Other tree works applications
In Lewisham
-
DC/26/145119 Awaiting decision
43 DEVONSHIRE ROAD, LONDON, SE23 3EN
FRONT: ONE Lime tree (T1) Ht 15m FELL to ground level & treat stump REASON: A remedy to the differential foundation movement at the insured property and to ensure the long-term stability of the building. To limit the extent and need for expensive and disruptive engineering repair works at the insured property. To limit the extent and need for costly CO2e emissions relating to alternative engineering repair works at the insured property. It is the case that an alternative to felling such as pruning or significant 'pollarding' of the tree would not provide a reliable or sustainable remedy to the subsidence in this case. We do not consider that any other potential means of mitigation, including root barriers, would be effective or appropriate in the circumstances. We are satisfied that the evidence obtained following completion of our Arboricultural Implication Assessment report completed 31/01/2024 clearly links the Lime T1 and False Acacia T2 as the cause of damage to the risk address. REPLANTING: Insurers understanding the requirement to offer replacement planting in the event consent to fell is granted. 43 DEVONSHIRE ROAD TREE PRESERVATION ORDER 2024 DC/24/135159
-
DC/26/145120 Awaiting decision
45A DEVONSHIRE ROAD, LONDON, SE23 3EN
FRONT: ONE False Acacia tree (T2) Ht 10m FELL to ground level and treat stump with eco plugs (broadleaved). REASON: Proposed as a remedy to the differential foundation movement at the insured property and to ensure the long-term stability of the building. The above tree works are proposed to limit the extent and need for expensive and disruptive engineering repair works at the insured property It is the case that an alternative to felling such as pruning or significant 'pollarding' of the tree would not provide a reliable or sustainable remedy to the subsidence in this case. We do not consider that any other potential means of mitigation, including root barriers, would be effective or appropriate in the circumstances. We are satisfied that the evidence obtained following completion of our Arboricultural Implication Assessment report completed 31/01/2024 clearly links the Lime T1 and False Acacia T2 as the cause of damage to the risk address. REPLANTING: Insurers understanding the requirement to offer replacement planting in the event consent to fell is granted. 45 DEVONSHIRE ROAD TREE PRESERVATION ORDER DC/24/136999
-
DC/26/144620 Granted
249A KIRKDALE, LONDON, SE26 4QD
FRONT: THREE Lime (T1,T2,T3)(ht.7-8m) carefully re pollard the crown back to old points aproximately 3 metres of regrowth FRONT: ONE hornbeam (T4)(ht.8m) reduce the overall size of crown by 3 metres. These trees are causing excessive shading
-
DC/26/144984 Granted
9 EXETER PLACE, LONDON, SE26 6AB
REAR (fronting Wells Park Rd) ONE Sycamore (T2, in TPO A1)(ht.12-14m) FELL by dismantling to safe standing stem or high stump. Reason: health & safety, the tree is in severe physiological and structural decline, leaning towards the road, several branches have already failed, and although a small amount of live growth remains, the tree has no meaningful long-term viability, the significantly compromised structure presents an unacceptable risk of further branch or whole-tree failure onto highway. The proposed removal is necessary to eliminate the risk. The replacement tree is to be a large canopy species planted as near as practicable to the original location. The County of London (Lewisham No.2) Tree Preservation Order, 1957. Informative A: thank you for proposing 4x replacement trees, 1x is required to be a large canopy tree to replace the TPO tree and to maintain the treed boundary character to Wells Park Road for public streetscape amenity, wildlife and shade to reduce increasingly high summer temperatures due to climate change ? Hornbeam, Hop hornbeam, sessile oak, Japanese Pagoda Tree, walnut (Juglans regia), Italian alder or grey alder, Caucasian Elm (Zelkova carpinifolia), small leaved lime, Hackberry (Celtis australis), Turkish hazel (Corylus colurna), Kentucky Coffee Tree (Gymnocladus dioica) - see further planting details below. Informative B: thank you for planting additional voluntary trees for screening, to improve species diversity, and the setting of the property. Informative C: thank you also for looking to retain a safe standing stem/high stump and creating habitat log piles with some dead wood arisings for wildlife and biodiversity.
-
DC/26/144936 Granted
12 PRINCETHORPE ROAD, LONDON, SE26 4PF
REAR: ONE Lombardy Poplar (T1)(ht.16m) CROWN REDUCE by 10-11m to ht.5-6m, REDUCE SPREAD from 10m to 5m to create new pollard. Reason: multi-stemmed tree has had a major stem failure exposing large cavity approx.2m above gd level. Remaining stem above cavity is weighted towards neighbouring properties and a crown reduction to reduce weight and sail above cavity is urgently needed to minimise risk of future failures. Merely reducing the one stem would drastically change the balance of the overall canopy and exposure to wind would be likely to cause more failures on the remaining stems. Crown reduction is required for safety to reduce overall canopy to approximately 5-6m from ground level (please see annotated photo) to create a new pollard. Informative A: thank you for managing the tree by safe reduction to retain as a low pollard for rear amenity, wildlife and canopy shade to reduce heatwave temperatures due to climate change. Informative B: please create habitat log piles with arisings for wildlife and biodiversity.