100A PERRY RISE, LONDON, SE23 2QP

This site has had 3 applications since 2014: 2 approved, 0 refused.

• DC/14/086614 Granted

  100A PERRY RISE, LONDON, SE23 2QP

  Removal of existing timber sash and casement windows to all elevations and removal of rear door at 100 A Perry Rise SE23, with installation of new white double glazed uPVC top-hung and side-hung casement windows and uPVC rear door.

  Decided 22 Jul 2014 Full applications
• DC/14/86614 Granted

  100A PERRY RISE, LONDON, SE23 2QP

  Removal of existing timber sash and casement windows to all elevations and removal of rear door at 100 A Perry Rise SE23, with installation of new white double glazed uPVC top-hung and side-hung casement windows and uPVC rear door.

  Decided 22 Jul 2014 Full applications

1. 6 Mar 2020

   Received by Lewisham

2. 12 Mar 2020

   Decision issued: Withdrawn by Applicant

3. 20 Aug 2026

   Added to PlanIndex

The applicant withdrew this application before Lewisham decided it, and is free to submit a revised scheme at any time. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.

Applications for works to trees cover protected trees: consent under a tree preservation order, or six weeks notice for trees in a conservation area. More in our guide to planning application types.

• 140 PERRY RISE, LONDON, SE23 2QP

  DC/23/130032 Submitted 23 Jan 2023 50 yards away

  The installation of replacement windows and back door at 140 Perry Rise SE23.

  Granted Full applications Windows or glazing 10 docs

• 134 PERRY RISE, LONDON, SE23 2QP

  DC/26/144012 Submitted 14 May 2026 50 yards away

  An application submitted under Section 96a of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990 for a non-material amendment in connection with the planning permission (DC/25/142508) dated 19 December 2025, in order to allow:- a single tilt and turn window (max. 1.2m wide) in place of the two doors on the juliette balcony (0.975m wide on the planning drawings) at 134 Perry Rise, SE23.

  Granted Amendments Windows or glazing 7 docs

• FIRST FLOOR FLAT, 106 PERRY RISE, LONDON, SE23 2QP

  DC/17/101735 Submitted 23 May 2017 50 yards away

  The construction of a hip-to-gable extension and roof extension in the rear roof slope at First floor Flat, 106 Perry Rise, SE23, together with the installation of three rooflights in the front roof slope.

  Granted Full applications Extension Loft or dormer 8 docs

• 96 Perry Rise, London, SE23 2QP

  DC/08/068354/FT Submitted 5 Mar 2008 50 yards away

  The installation of double-glazed Aluminum replacement windows to 96 Perry Rise SE23.

  Granted Full applications Windows or glazing 5 docs

• 134 PERRY RISE, LONDON, SE23 2QP

  DC/25/142508 Submitted 19 Dec 2025 50 yards away

  Construction of a rear dormer with Juliette balcony and two front slope rooflights to 134 Perry Rise, SE23.

  Granted Full applications Loft or dormer 16 docs

• 148 & 150 PERRY RISE, LONDON, SE23 2QP

  DC/19/114482 Submitted 30 Oct 2019 50 yards away

  The installation of replacement uPVC windows and doors at 148 & 150 Perry Rise SE23.

  Granted Full applications Windows or glazing 8 docs

• DC/26/145119 Awaiting decision

  43 DEVONSHIRE ROAD, LONDON, SE23 3EN

  FRONT: ONE Lime tree (T1) Ht 15m FELL to ground level & treat stump REASON: A remedy to the differential foundation movement at the insured property and to ensure the long-term stability of the building. To limit the extent and need for expensive and disruptive engineering repair works at the insured property. To limit the extent and need for costly CO2e emissions relating to alternative engineering repair works at the insured property. It is the case that an alternative to felling such as pruning or significant 'pollarding' of the tree would not provide a reliable or sustainable remedy to the subsidence in this case. We do not consider that any other potential means of mitigation, including root barriers, would be effective or appropriate in the circumstances. We are satisfied that the evidence obtained following completion of our Arboricultural Implication Assessment report completed 31/01/2024 clearly links the Lime T1 and False Acacia T2 as the cause of damage to the risk address. REPLANTING: Insurers understanding the requirement to offer replacement planting in the event consent to fell is granted. 43 DEVONSHIRE ROAD TREE PRESERVATION ORDER 2024 DC/24/135159

  Received 20 Aug, published by the council 26 Aug 2026 Trees
• DC/26/145120 Awaiting decision

  45A DEVONSHIRE ROAD, LONDON, SE23 3EN

  FRONT: ONE False Acacia tree (T2) Ht 10m FELL to ground level and treat stump with eco plugs (broadleaved). REASON: Proposed as a remedy to the differential foundation movement at the insured property and to ensure the long-term stability of the building. The above tree works are proposed to limit the extent and need for expensive and disruptive engineering repair works at the insured property It is the case that an alternative to felling such as pruning or significant 'pollarding' of the tree would not provide a reliable or sustainable remedy to the subsidence in this case. We do not consider that any other potential means of mitigation, including root barriers, would be effective or appropriate in the circumstances. We are satisfied that the evidence obtained following completion of our Arboricultural Implication Assessment report completed 31/01/2024 clearly links the Lime T1 and False Acacia T2 as the cause of damage to the risk address. REPLANTING: Insurers understanding the requirement to offer replacement planting in the event consent to fell is granted. 45 DEVONSHIRE ROAD TREE PRESERVATION ORDER DC/24/136999

  Received 20 Aug, published by the council 26 Aug 2026 Trees
• DC/26/144620 Granted

  249A KIRKDALE, LONDON, SE26 4QD

  FRONT: THREE Lime (T1,T2,T3)(ht.7-8m) carefully re pollard the crown back to old points aproximately 3 metres of regrowth FRONT: ONE hornbeam (T4)(ht.8m) reduce the overall size of crown by 3 metres. These trees are causing excessive shading

  Received 7 Jul, published by the council 20 Aug 2026 Trees
• DC/26/144984 Granted

  9 EXETER PLACE, LONDON, SE26 6AB

  REAR (fronting Wells Park Rd) ONE Sycamore (T2, in TPO A1)(ht.12-14m) FELL by dismantling to safe standing stem or high stump. Reason: health & safety, the tree is in severe physiological and structural decline, leaning towards the road, several branches have already failed, and although a small amount of live growth remains, the tree has no meaningful long-term viability, the significantly compromised structure presents an unacceptable risk of further branch or whole-tree failure onto highway. The proposed removal is necessary to eliminate the risk. The replacement tree is to be a large canopy species planted as near as practicable to the original location. The County of London (Lewisham No.2) Tree Preservation Order, 1957. Informative A: thank you for proposing 4x replacement trees, 1x is required to be a large canopy tree to replace the TPO tree and to maintain the treed boundary character to Wells Park Road for public streetscape amenity, wildlife and shade to reduce increasingly high summer temperatures due to climate change ? Hornbeam, Hop hornbeam, sessile oak, Japanese Pagoda Tree, walnut (Juglans regia), Italian alder or grey alder, Caucasian Elm (Zelkova carpinifolia), small leaved lime, Hackberry (Celtis australis), Turkish hazel (Corylus colurna), Kentucky Coffee Tree (Gymnocladus dioica) - see further planting details below. Informative B: thank you for planting additional voluntary trees for screening, to improve species diversity, and the setting of the property. Informative C: thank you also for looking to retain a safe standing stem/high stump and creating habitat log piles with some dead wood arisings for wildlife and biodiversity.

  Received 5 Aug, published by the council 10 Aug 2026 Trees
• DC/26/144936 Granted

  12 PRINCETHORPE ROAD, LONDON, SE26 4PF

  REAR: ONE Lombardy Poplar (T1)(ht.16m) CROWN REDUCE by 10-11m to ht.5-6m, REDUCE SPREAD from 10m to 5m to create new pollard. Reason: multi-stemmed tree has had a major stem failure exposing large cavity approx.2m above gd level. Remaining stem above cavity is weighted towards neighbouring properties and a crown reduction to reduce weight and sail above cavity is urgently needed to minimise risk of future failures. Merely reducing the one stem would drastically change the balance of the overall canopy and exposure to wind would be likely to cause more failures on the remaining stems. Crown reduction is required for safety to reduce overall canopy to approximately 5-6m from ground level (please see annotated photo) to create a new pollard. Informative A: thank you for managing the tree by safe reduction to retain as a low pollard for rear amenity, wildlife and canopy shade to reduce heatwave temperatures due to climate change. Informative B: please create habitat log piles with arisings for wildlife and biodiversity.

  Received 3 Aug, published by the council 10 Aug 2026 Trees