Skip to content
PlanIndex Get alerts
Menu

Planning application

8 LION CLOSE, LONDON, SE4 1JE

Withdrawn Lewisham DC/13/85915 Works to Trees

Works: Trees

Withdrawn before a decision, so it carries no planning weight. A revised scheme can be submitted at any time.

Proposal

MATURE OAK TREE Following the removal on the 28 November of a LARGE storm damaged section from this tree our arborist reports that the remaining part of the crown of this tree is in a dangerous condition. As it stands the crown is unbalanced and is susceptible to further branch shedding should there be any further high winds. We advise: reduce remaining crown by 5-6m to leave a bare frame work for future management

As published by the council, reference DC/13/85915

Application record

Reference
DC/13/85915
Type
Works to Trees
Status
Withdrawn
Decision
Withdrawn As published: Withdrawn Returned to Applicant
Received
12 Dec 2013
Decided
2 Jan 2014
Ward
Ladywell
Decision by
Delegated
Postcode
SE4 1JE

Timeline

Dates from the published record

  1. 12 Dec 2013

    Received by Lewisham

  2. 2 Jan 2014

    Decision issued: Withdrawn Returned to Applicant

  3. 20 Aug 2026

    Added to PlanIndex

What withdrawal means

The applicant withdrew this application before Lewisham decided it, and is free to submit a revised scheme at any time. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.

About tree works applications

Applications for works to trees cover protected trees: consent under a tree preservation order, or six weeks notice for trees in a conservation area. More in our guide to planning application types.

Nearby applications

Within 0.3 miles

  • 10 LION CLOSE, LONDON, SE4 1JE

    DC/13/85916 Submitted 12 Dec 2013 50 yards away

    T1 = Large Oak - Blocking out light and air to the property. - Crown thin 15%. - Clean through crown removing deadwood. - Perform aerial inspection of crown.

    Withdrawn Trees
  • CATFORD GREYHOUND STADIUM LTD, ADENMORE ROAD, LONDON, SE6 4RJ

    DC/18/109678 Submitted 12 Nov 2018 200 yards away

    An application submitted under Section 96 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 for a non-material amendment for the revised wording relating to Condition (7) (footbridge details) in connection with the planning permission DC/07/67276 dated 30 January 2009 (as amended by the permission DC/14/089821 dated 29 May 2015), for 'the construction of 588 residential units, commercial floor space and a community centre in 13 blocks, rising to a maximum of eight storeys in height, on the site of the former Catford Greyhound Stadium, including the land in between the railway lines and the South Circular (A205), comprising of 216 one bedroom and 311 two bedroom self-contained flats; 39 three bedroom and 23 four bedroom houses/maisonettes, as well as Use Classes A1/A2/B1 retail/commercial floorspace (508m²) and a Use Class D1 community centre (298m²), together with associated landscaping, including river naturalisation and creation of a public plaza between Catford and Catford Bridge Stations, provision of a footbridge to Doggett Road, an electricity sub-station, bin stores, 649 cycle spaces and 248 car parking spaces' in order that details of the footbridge are required to be submitted prior to commencement of works to construct the bridge and not linked to construction of the residential blocks.

    Granted Amendments New dwelling 5 docs
  • 26 RUSHEY MEAD, LONDON, SE4 1JJ

    DC/19/110830 Submitted 5 Feb 2019 300 yards away

    Construction of dormer roof extension on the rear roof slope of 26 Rushey Mead, SE4 including one roof light in the front roof slope.

    Refused Householder Extension Loft or dormer 17 docs
    Domestic
  • 97 EWHURST ROAD, LONDON, SE4 1SD

    DC/23/129936 Submitted 16 Jan 2023 300 yards away

    Application for a Lawful Development Certificate (proposed submitted under Section 192 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) and Class A of Schedule 2, Part 1,? of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) for the construction of a single storey rear extension at 97 Ewhurst Road, SE4 1SD

    Granted Lawful development Extension 5 docs
    Small domestic
  • 87 EWHURST ROAD, LONDON, SE4 1SD

    DC/23/129922 Submitted 13 Jan 2023 300 yards away

    Application for a Lawful Development Certificate (proposed) submitted under Section 192 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) and Class B & C of Schedule 2, Part 1 of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) for the constructoin of a hip to gable and rear roof extension with the installation of two roof lights in the front roof slope at 87 EWHURST ROAD, SE4

    Granted Lawful development Extension Loft or dormer 5 docs
  • 86 EWHURST ROAD, LONDON, SE4 1SD

    DC/21/121091 Submitted 29 Mar 2021 300 yards away

    Proposed construction of a two storey side extension at 86 Ewhurst Road SE4, together with the construction of a single storey rear extension, elevational alterations and associated works

    Granted Householder Extension 15 docs
    Small domestic

In Lewisham

  • DC/26/145119 Awaiting decision

    43 DEVONSHIRE ROAD, LONDON, SE23 3EN

    FRONT: ONE Lime tree (T1) Ht 15m FELL to ground level & treat stump REASON: A remedy to the differential foundation movement at the insured property and to ensure the long-term stability of the building. To limit the extent and need for expensive and disruptive engineering repair works at the insured property. To limit the extent and need for costly CO2e emissions relating to alternative engineering repair works at the insured property. It is the case that an alternative to felling such as pruning or significant 'pollarding' of the tree would not provide a reliable or sustainable remedy to the subsidence in this case. We do not consider that any other potential means of mitigation, including root barriers, would be effective or appropriate in the circumstances. We are satisfied that the evidence obtained following completion of our Arboricultural Implication Assessment report completed 31/01/2024 clearly links the Lime T1 and False Acacia T2 as the cause of damage to the risk address. REPLANTING: Insurers understanding the requirement to offer replacement planting in the event consent to fell is granted. 43 DEVONSHIRE ROAD TREE PRESERVATION ORDER 2024 DC/24/135159

    Received 20 Aug, published by the council 26 Aug 2026 Trees
  • DC/26/145120 Awaiting decision

    45A DEVONSHIRE ROAD, LONDON, SE23 3EN

    FRONT: ONE False Acacia tree (T2) Ht 10m FELL to ground level and treat stump with eco plugs (broadleaved). REASON: Proposed as a remedy to the differential foundation movement at the insured property and to ensure the long-term stability of the building. The above tree works are proposed to limit the extent and need for expensive and disruptive engineering repair works at the insured property It is the case that an alternative to felling such as pruning or significant 'pollarding' of the tree would not provide a reliable or sustainable remedy to the subsidence in this case. We do not consider that any other potential means of mitigation, including root barriers, would be effective or appropriate in the circumstances. We are satisfied that the evidence obtained following completion of our Arboricultural Implication Assessment report completed 31/01/2024 clearly links the Lime T1 and False Acacia T2 as the cause of damage to the risk address. REPLANTING: Insurers understanding the requirement to offer replacement planting in the event consent to fell is granted. 45 DEVONSHIRE ROAD TREE PRESERVATION ORDER DC/24/136999

    Received 20 Aug, published by the council 26 Aug 2026 Trees
  • DC/26/144620 Granted

    249A KIRKDALE, LONDON, SE26 4QD

    FRONT: THREE Lime (T1,T2,T3)(ht.7-8m) carefully re pollard the crown back to old points aproximately 3 metres of regrowth FRONT: ONE hornbeam (T4)(ht.8m) reduce the overall size of crown by 3 metres. These trees are causing excessive shading

    Received 7 Jul, published by the council 20 Aug 2026 Trees
  • DC/26/144984 Granted

    9 EXETER PLACE, LONDON, SE26 6AB

    REAR (fronting Wells Park Rd) ONE Sycamore (T2, in TPO A1)(ht.12-14m) FELL by dismantling to safe standing stem or high stump. Reason: health & safety, the tree is in severe physiological and structural decline, leaning towards the road, several branches have already failed, and although a small amount of live growth remains, the tree has no meaningful long-term viability, the significantly compromised structure presents an unacceptable risk of further branch or whole-tree failure onto highway. The proposed removal is necessary to eliminate the risk. The replacement tree is to be a large canopy species planted as near as practicable to the original location. The County of London (Lewisham No.2) Tree Preservation Order, 1957. Informative A: thank you for proposing 4x replacement trees, 1x is required to be a large canopy tree to replace the TPO tree and to maintain the treed boundary character to Wells Park Road for public streetscape amenity, wildlife and shade to reduce increasingly high summer temperatures due to climate change ? Hornbeam, Hop hornbeam, sessile oak, Japanese Pagoda Tree, walnut (Juglans regia), Italian alder or grey alder, Caucasian Elm (Zelkova carpinifolia), small leaved lime, Hackberry (Celtis australis), Turkish hazel (Corylus colurna), Kentucky Coffee Tree (Gymnocladus dioica) - see further planting details below. Informative B: thank you for planting additional voluntary trees for screening, to improve species diversity, and the setting of the property. Informative C: thank you also for looking to retain a safe standing stem/high stump and creating habitat log piles with some dead wood arisings for wildlife and biodiversity.

    Received 5 Aug, published by the council 10 Aug 2026 Trees
  • DC/26/144936 Granted

    12 PRINCETHORPE ROAD, LONDON, SE26 4PF

    REAR: ONE Lombardy Poplar (T1)(ht.16m) CROWN REDUCE by 10-11m to ht.5-6m, REDUCE SPREAD from 10m to 5m to create new pollard. Reason: multi-stemmed tree has had a major stem failure exposing large cavity approx.2m above gd level. Remaining stem above cavity is weighted towards neighbouring properties and a crown reduction to reduce weight and sail above cavity is urgently needed to minimise risk of future failures. Merely reducing the one stem would drastically change the balance of the overall canopy and exposure to wind would be likely to cause more failures on the remaining stems. Crown reduction is required for safety to reduce overall canopy to approximately 5-6m from ground level (please see annotated photo) to create a new pollard. Informative A: thank you for managing the tree by safe reduction to retain as a low pollard for rear amenity, wildlife and canopy shade to reduce heatwave temperatures due to climate change. Informative B: please create habitat log piles with arisings for wildlife and biodiversity.

    Received 3 Aug, published by the council 10 Aug 2026 Trees