Planning application
GLEBE COURT, THE GLEBE, LONDON, SE3 9TH
Works: Trees
Permission granted. Work must normally begin within three years of the decision or the permission lapses.
Proposal
Frontage - ONE Pink Horse Chestnut (T1 within the 2008 Order)
As published by the council, reference DC/13/83539
Application record
- Reference
- DC/13/83539
- Type
- Dead & Hazardous Trees
- Status
- Decided
- Decision
- Granted As published: Raise No Objection
- Received
- 17 May 2013
- Validated
- 17 May 2013
- Decided
- 14 Jun 2013
- Ward
- Blackheath
- Decision by
- Delegated
- Postcode
- SE3 9TH
Site history
Applications at this address on the Lewisham register
This site has had 4 applications since 2008: 3 approved, 0 refused.
-
DC/13/083539 Granted
GLEBE COURT, THE GLEBE, LONDON, SE3 9TH
Frontage - ONE Pink Horse Chestnut (T1 within the 2008 Order)
-
DC/09/071232 Granted
GLEBE COURT, THE GLEBE, LONDON, SE3 9TH
Crown reduce by 30-40%, crown thin by 10% and remove dead wood from a Horse Chestnut tree T1 to the front of Glebe Court, The Glebe, SE3.
-
DC/17/103225 Withdrawn
GLEBE COURT, THE GLEBE, LONDON, SE3 9TH
Tree preservation order Glebe Court The Glebe, dated 12th August 2008 made pursuant to the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. This order was confirmed without modification on 3rd February 2009.
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
17 May 2013
Received by Lewisham
-
14 Jun 2013
Decision issued: Raise No Objection
-
20 Aug 2026
Added to PlanIndex
Documents
Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report
1 document on file for this application
A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.
Watch members (£5 a month) open the document list from here.
Open the documentsWhat this grant of permission means
Lewisham granted permission on 14 June 2013, subject to any conditions on the decision notice. Work must normally begin within three years or the permission lapses. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.
About tree works applications
Applications for works to trees cover protected trees: consent under a tree preservation order, or six weeks notice for trees in a conservation area. More in our guide to planning application types.
Nearby applications
Within 0.3 miles
-
15 GLEBE COURT, THE GLEBE, LONDON, SE3 9TH
The Installation of replacement black, PVCu double-glazed casement windows in the front and rear elevations of 15 Glebe Court, The Glebe SE3.
Granted Full applications Windows or glazing 9 docs -
15 GLEBE COURT, THE GLEBE, LONDON, SE3 9TH
The Installation of replacement black, PVCu double-glazed casement windows in the front and rear elevations of 15 Glebe Court, The Glebe SE3.
Granted Full applications Windows or glazing 9 docs -
2 GLEBE COURT, THE GLEBE, LONDON, SE3 9TH
FRONT: ONE Sycamore (T1)(ht.8m) FELL. Reason: at the front of the estate is a dead sycamore tree close to the front boundary and the public footpath. The tree is dead and presents a safety risk to residents and general public. Duty to replace applies. Informative A: duty applies to plant replacement trees for dead trees in conservation areas, suggested species to replace the dead sycamore: Robinia, whitebeam, paperbark maple, Magnolia Kobus, wild service tree, hawthorn, crab apple, pear, mulberry for streetscape amenity. Informative B: a second replacement tree is encouraged for the adjacent dead holly, felled ref DC/21/123404, to maintain front tree amenity. Informative C: retaining safe standing dead stem or high stump is encouraged together with creating habitat log piles from arisings for wildlife and biodiversity.
Granted Trees 5 docs -
19 GLEBE COURT, THE GLEBE, LONDON, SE3 9TH
FRONT: ONE Eucalyptus (T1)(ht.6m) FELL and replace. Reason: fasting growing tree growing against property, to replace with more appropriate planting. Informative A: the proposed replacement planting is greatly appreciated as the property backs onto railsides which are designated Green Corridor and Site of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINC). Informative B: suggested native species for the replacement tree in the front garden area are: crab apple, pear, hawthorn, holly, Wild Service tree, whitebeam, field maple, wild cherry, Amelanchier, alder, birch, bird cherry, small leaved lime.
Granted Trees 3 docs -
18 GLEBE COURT, THE GLEBE, LONDON, SE3 9TH
REAR: ONE Beech (T1)(ht.13m,r.8m) HEIGHT REDUCE by 3m to ht.10m, LATERAL REDUCE spread by 2m from r.8m to r.6m. Reason: light issues, reduction to manage within the garden setting. Informative A: the property is adjacent to the railside designated green corridor and Site of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINC). Therefore the sensitive management to retain the beech for rear amenity, urban greening, wildlife, environment, wellbeing and climate change mitigation benefits is greatly appreciated.
Granted Trees 4 docs -
GLEBE COURT, THE GLEBE, LONDON, SE3 9TH
Crown reduce by 30-40%, crown thin by 10% and remove dead wood from a Horse Chestnut tree T1 to the front of Glebe Court, The Glebe, SE3.
Granted Trees 4 docs
Other tree works applications
In Lewisham
-
DC/26/145119 Awaiting decision
43 DEVONSHIRE ROAD, LONDON, SE23 3EN
FRONT: ONE Lime tree (T1) Ht 15m FELL to ground level & treat stump REASON: A remedy to the differential foundation movement at the insured property and to ensure the long-term stability of the building. To limit the extent and need for expensive and disruptive engineering repair works at the insured property. To limit the extent and need for costly CO2e emissions relating to alternative engineering repair works at the insured property. It is the case that an alternative to felling such as pruning or significant 'pollarding' of the tree would not provide a reliable or sustainable remedy to the subsidence in this case. We do not consider that any other potential means of mitigation, including root barriers, would be effective or appropriate in the circumstances. We are satisfied that the evidence obtained following completion of our Arboricultural Implication Assessment report completed 31/01/2024 clearly links the Lime T1 and False Acacia T2 as the cause of damage to the risk address. REPLANTING: Insurers understanding the requirement to offer replacement planting in the event consent to fell is granted. 43 DEVONSHIRE ROAD TREE PRESERVATION ORDER 2024 DC/24/135159
-
DC/26/145120 Awaiting decision
45A DEVONSHIRE ROAD, LONDON, SE23 3EN
FRONT: ONE False Acacia tree (T2) Ht 10m FELL to ground level and treat stump with eco plugs (broadleaved). REASON: Proposed as a remedy to the differential foundation movement at the insured property and to ensure the long-term stability of the building. The above tree works are proposed to limit the extent and need for expensive and disruptive engineering repair works at the insured property It is the case that an alternative to felling such as pruning or significant 'pollarding' of the tree would not provide a reliable or sustainable remedy to the subsidence in this case. We do not consider that any other potential means of mitigation, including root barriers, would be effective or appropriate in the circumstances. We are satisfied that the evidence obtained following completion of our Arboricultural Implication Assessment report completed 31/01/2024 clearly links the Lime T1 and False Acacia T2 as the cause of damage to the risk address. REPLANTING: Insurers understanding the requirement to offer replacement planting in the event consent to fell is granted. 45 DEVONSHIRE ROAD TREE PRESERVATION ORDER DC/24/136999
-
DC/26/144620 Granted
249A KIRKDALE, LONDON, SE26 4QD
FRONT: THREE Lime (T1,T2,T3)(ht.7-8m) carefully re pollard the crown back to old points aproximately 3 metres of regrowth FRONT: ONE hornbeam (T4)(ht.8m) reduce the overall size of crown by 3 metres. These trees are causing excessive shading
-
DC/26/144984 Granted
9 EXETER PLACE, LONDON, SE26 6AB
REAR (fronting Wells Park Rd) ONE Sycamore (T2, in TPO A1)(ht.12-14m) FELL by dismantling to safe standing stem or high stump. Reason: health & safety, the tree is in severe physiological and structural decline, leaning towards the road, several branches have already failed, and although a small amount of live growth remains, the tree has no meaningful long-term viability, the significantly compromised structure presents an unacceptable risk of further branch or whole-tree failure onto highway. The proposed removal is necessary to eliminate the risk. The replacement tree is to be a large canopy species planted as near as practicable to the original location. The County of London (Lewisham No.2) Tree Preservation Order, 1957. Informative A: thank you for proposing 4x replacement trees, 1x is required to be a large canopy tree to replace the TPO tree and to maintain the treed boundary character to Wells Park Road for public streetscape amenity, wildlife and shade to reduce increasingly high summer temperatures due to climate change ? Hornbeam, Hop hornbeam, sessile oak, Japanese Pagoda Tree, walnut (Juglans regia), Italian alder or grey alder, Caucasian Elm (Zelkova carpinifolia), small leaved lime, Hackberry (Celtis australis), Turkish hazel (Corylus colurna), Kentucky Coffee Tree (Gymnocladus dioica) - see further planting details below. Informative B: thank you for planting additional voluntary trees for screening, to improve species diversity, and the setting of the property. Informative C: thank you also for looking to retain a safe standing stem/high stump and creating habitat log piles with some dead wood arisings for wildlife and biodiversity.
-
DC/26/144936 Granted
12 PRINCETHORPE ROAD, LONDON, SE26 4PF
REAR: ONE Lombardy Poplar (T1)(ht.16m) CROWN REDUCE by 10-11m to ht.5-6m, REDUCE SPREAD from 10m to 5m to create new pollard. Reason: multi-stemmed tree has had a major stem failure exposing large cavity approx.2m above gd level. Remaining stem above cavity is weighted towards neighbouring properties and a crown reduction to reduce weight and sail above cavity is urgently needed to minimise risk of future failures. Merely reducing the one stem would drastically change the balance of the overall canopy and exposure to wind would be likely to cause more failures on the remaining stems. Crown reduction is required for safety to reduce overall canopy to approximately 5-6m from ground level (please see annotated photo) to create a new pollard. Informative A: thank you for managing the tree by safe reduction to retain as a low pollard for rear amenity, wildlife and canopy shade to reduce heatwave temperatures due to climate change. Informative B: please create habitat log piles with arisings for wildlife and biodiversity.