Planning application
FLAT 4, 25 MONTPELIER ROW, LONDON, SE3 0RT
Works: Trees
Permission granted. Work must normally begin within three years of the decision or the permission lapses.
Proposal
Rear Garden along Eastern Boundary - ONE Sycamore Cut Back 3 meters from Flats (western crown) and Deadwood, ONE Lime Reduce 1 Branch Growing into the Holm Oak, 2 meters Reduction on the Above Branch & Deadwood & ONE Bay Suppressed by the TPO Ash (T6 within the Order) FELL.
As published by the council, reference DC/13/83417
Application record
- Reference
- DC/13/83417
- Type
- Trees in Conservation Areas
- Status
- Decided
- Decision
- Granted As published: Raise No Objection
- Received
- 29 Apr 2013
- Validated
- 29 Apr 2013
- Decided
- 12 Jul 2013
- Ward
- Blackheath
- Decision by
- Delegated
- Postcode
- SE3 0RT
Site history
Applications at this address on the Lewisham register
This site has had 6 applications since 2013: 6 approved, 0 refused.
-
DC/23/131790 Granted
FLAT 4, 25 MONTPELIER ROW, LONDON, SE3 0RT
REAR: ONE Ash/Lime (T1)(ht:15m) FELL. Reason: self-seeded Ash has grown hard up against a boundary wall and branches are interfering with an adjacent property in very close proximity. REAR: ONE Lime (T2)(ht:15m) CROWN REDUCE HEIGHT by 3m from 15m to 12m. Reason: routine maintenance, proximity to buildings. REAR SIDE (to Wemyss Rd): ONE Sycamore (T4)(ht:15m) CROWN REDUCE HEIGHT by 3m from 15m to 12m, remove epicormic shoots. Reason: tree sits on a high raised bank above a school. REAR: ONE Mimosa (T6)(ht:13m) CROWN REDUCE HEIGHT by 2m from 13m to 11m, remove deadwood. Reason: tree damaged by storm, leaving a split trunk. Informative A: the sensitive management of the trees to retain the treed character of the grounds is greatly appreciated for landscape amenity, urban forest canopy to mitigate climate change, wellbeing, wildlife and environmental benefits. Informative B: please create habitat log piles, and a linear 'dead hedge' for wildlife and biodiversity with arisings.
-
DC/23/131837 Granted
FLAT 4, 25 MONTPELIER ROW, LONDON, SE3 0RT
REAR: ONE Sycamore (T3/TPO T4)(ht:15m) CROWN REDUCE HEIGHT by 3m from 15m to 12m, remove epicormic shoots. Reason: health & safety, tree sits on a high raised bank above a school. REAR: ONE Ash (T5/TPO T1)(ht:15m) CROWN REDUCE HEIGHT by 3m from 15m to 12m, remove epicormic shoots. Reason: health & safety, tree sits on a high raised bank above a school. Tree Preservation Order relating to Montpelier Row and Wemyss Road dated 3rd February 1976 Informative A: the sensitive management of the trees to retain the treed character of the grounds is greatly appreciated for landscape amenity, urban forest canopy to mitigate climate change, wellbeing, wildlife and environmental benefits. Informative B: please create habitat log piles, and a linear 'dead hedge' for wildlife and biodiversity with arisings.
-
DC/13/083417 Granted
FLAT 4, 25 MONTPELIER ROW, LONDON, SE3 0RT
Rear Garden along Eastern Boundary - ONE Sycamore Cut Back 3 meters from Flats (western crown) and Deadwood, ONE Lime Reduce 1 Branch Growing into the Holm Oak, 2 meters Reduction on the Above Branch & Deadwood & ONE Bay Suppressed by the TPO Ash (T6 within the Order) FELL.
-
DC/13/83350 Granted
FLAT 4, 25 MONTPELIER ROW, LONDON, SE3 0RT
Rear Garden - ONE Holm Oak (T3 on Plan T2 within the 1976 Order) Reduction the Vertical height of the tree by up to 1.5 metres, Reduction of Lateral Width of the Braches at All Compass Points by up to 1.5 metres and Crown Thinning by up to 10% the Remaining Crown., ONE Ash (T6 on Plan and T1 within the 1976 Order) Lateral Reduction by up to 3 meters of the Branches Over Hanging Nursery, Deadwood and Remove One Broken Branch, ONE Sycamore (T4 on Plan could be T4 within the 1976 Order) and ONE Sycamore (T5 on Plan could be T4 within the 1976 Order) Deadwood and Lateral Reduction by up to 3 meters of Branches Over Hanging Nursery.
-
DC/13/083350 Granted
FLAT 4, 25 MONTPELIER ROW, LONDON, SE3 0RT
Rear Garden - ONE Holm Oak (T3 on Plan T2 within the 1976 Order) Reduction the Vertical height of the tree by up to 1.5 metres, Reduction of Lateral Width of the Braches at All Compass Points by up to 1.5 metres and Crown Thinning by up to 10% the Remaining Crown., ONE Ash (T6 on Plan and T1 within the 1976 Order) Lateral Reduction by up to 3 meters of the Branches Over Hanging Nursery, Deadwood and Remove One Broken Branch, ONE Sycamore (T4 on Plan could be T4 within the 1976 Order) and ONE Sycamore (T5 on Plan could be T4 within the 1976 Order) Deadwood and Lateral Reduction by up to 3 meters of Branches Over Hanging Nursery.
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
29 Apr 2013
Received by Lewisham
-
12 Jul 2013
Decision issued: Raise No Objection
-
20 Aug 2026
Added to PlanIndex
Who's behind it
Company information only, from the register and Companies House
Nemus Tree Care Ltd Agent, a tree-works contractor
10 applications on PlanIndex · across 2 councils
Trade members see everything this firm has filed, how it was decided, and get an email the day it files again.
See their track recordDocuments
Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report
1 document on file for this application
A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.
Watch members (£5 a month) open the document list from here.
Open the documentsWhat this grant of permission means
Lewisham granted permission on 12 July 2013, subject to any conditions on the decision notice. Work must normally begin within three years or the permission lapses. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.
About tree works applications
Applications for works to trees cover protected trees: consent under a tree preservation order, or six weeks notice for trees in a conservation area. More in our guide to planning application types.
Nearby applications
Within 0.3 miles
-
25 MONTPELIER ROW, LONDON, SE3 0RT
Application for prior approval under Part 24 of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995 as amended, for the provision of an equipment cabinet on the pavement to the side of 25 Montpelier Row SE3.
Granted Telecoms 8 docs -
25 MONTPELIER ROW, LONDON, SE3 0RT
Application for prior approval under Part 24 of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995 as amended, for the provision of an equipment cabinet on the pavement to the side of 25 Montpelier Row SE3.
Granted Telecoms 8 docs -
25 MONTPELIER ROW, LONDON, SE3 0RT
REAR: ONE Elderberry (T3) (approx.ht.8m) FELL. Reason: overhanging school roof, basal decay. REAR: ONE Cherry (T4) (approx.ht.6-7m) FELL. Reason: close to school foundations, overhanging roof.
Granted Trees 5 docs -
25 MONTPELIER ROW, LONDON, SE3 0RT
REAR: ONE Sycamore (T1, T4 in TPO) LATERAL REDUCTION by 2-2.5m from 5m to 2.5-3m on S compass points. REAR: ONE Ash (T2, T1 in TPO) LATERAL REDUCTION by 2-2.5m from 5m to 2.5-3m on S compass points. Reason: health and safety ? overhanging branches have fallen onto the adjacent school building. The London Borough of Lewisham (Montpelier Row) Tree Preservation Order 1976
Granted Trees 13 docs -
25 MONTPELIER ROW, LONDON, SE3 0RT
Fell a Sycamore tree to the front of 25 Montpelier Row. SE3
Granted Trees 2 docs -
25 MONTPELIER ROW, LONDON, SE3 0RT
Fell a Sycamore tree to the front of 25 Montpelier Row. SE3
Granted Trees 2 docs
Other tree works applications
In Lewisham
-
DC/26/145119 Awaiting decision
43 DEVONSHIRE ROAD, LONDON, SE23 3EN
FRONT: ONE Lime tree (T1) Ht 15m FELL to ground level & treat stump REASON: A remedy to the differential foundation movement at the insured property and to ensure the long-term stability of the building. To limit the extent and need for expensive and disruptive engineering repair works at the insured property. To limit the extent and need for costly CO2e emissions relating to alternative engineering repair works at the insured property. It is the case that an alternative to felling such as pruning or significant 'pollarding' of the tree would not provide a reliable or sustainable remedy to the subsidence in this case. We do not consider that any other potential means of mitigation, including root barriers, would be effective or appropriate in the circumstances. We are satisfied that the evidence obtained following completion of our Arboricultural Implication Assessment report completed 31/01/2024 clearly links the Lime T1 and False Acacia T2 as the cause of damage to the risk address. REPLANTING: Insurers understanding the requirement to offer replacement planting in the event consent to fell is granted. 43 DEVONSHIRE ROAD TREE PRESERVATION ORDER 2024 DC/24/135159
-
DC/26/145120 Awaiting decision
45A DEVONSHIRE ROAD, LONDON, SE23 3EN
FRONT: ONE False Acacia tree (T2) Ht 10m FELL to ground level and treat stump with eco plugs (broadleaved). REASON: Proposed as a remedy to the differential foundation movement at the insured property and to ensure the long-term stability of the building. The above tree works are proposed to limit the extent and need for expensive and disruptive engineering repair works at the insured property It is the case that an alternative to felling such as pruning or significant 'pollarding' of the tree would not provide a reliable or sustainable remedy to the subsidence in this case. We do not consider that any other potential means of mitigation, including root barriers, would be effective or appropriate in the circumstances. We are satisfied that the evidence obtained following completion of our Arboricultural Implication Assessment report completed 31/01/2024 clearly links the Lime T1 and False Acacia T2 as the cause of damage to the risk address. REPLANTING: Insurers understanding the requirement to offer replacement planting in the event consent to fell is granted. 45 DEVONSHIRE ROAD TREE PRESERVATION ORDER DC/24/136999
-
DC/26/144620 Granted
249A KIRKDALE, LONDON, SE26 4QD
FRONT: THREE Lime (T1,T2,T3)(ht.7-8m) carefully re pollard the crown back to old points aproximately 3 metres of regrowth FRONT: ONE hornbeam (T4)(ht.8m) reduce the overall size of crown by 3 metres. These trees are causing excessive shading
-
DC/26/144984 Granted
9 EXETER PLACE, LONDON, SE26 6AB
REAR (fronting Wells Park Rd) ONE Sycamore (T2, in TPO A1)(ht.12-14m) FELL by dismantling to safe standing stem or high stump. Reason: health & safety, the tree is in severe physiological and structural decline, leaning towards the road, several branches have already failed, and although a small amount of live growth remains, the tree has no meaningful long-term viability, the significantly compromised structure presents an unacceptable risk of further branch or whole-tree failure onto highway. The proposed removal is necessary to eliminate the risk. The replacement tree is to be a large canopy species planted as near as practicable to the original location. The County of London (Lewisham No.2) Tree Preservation Order, 1957. Informative A: thank you for proposing 4x replacement trees, 1x is required to be a large canopy tree to replace the TPO tree and to maintain the treed boundary character to Wells Park Road for public streetscape amenity, wildlife and shade to reduce increasingly high summer temperatures due to climate change ? Hornbeam, Hop hornbeam, sessile oak, Japanese Pagoda Tree, walnut (Juglans regia), Italian alder or grey alder, Caucasian Elm (Zelkova carpinifolia), small leaved lime, Hackberry (Celtis australis), Turkish hazel (Corylus colurna), Kentucky Coffee Tree (Gymnocladus dioica) - see further planting details below. Informative B: thank you for planting additional voluntary trees for screening, to improve species diversity, and the setting of the property. Informative C: thank you also for looking to retain a safe standing stem/high stump and creating habitat log piles with some dead wood arisings for wildlife and biodiversity.
-
DC/26/144936 Granted
12 PRINCETHORPE ROAD, LONDON, SE26 4PF
REAR: ONE Lombardy Poplar (T1)(ht.16m) CROWN REDUCE by 10-11m to ht.5-6m, REDUCE SPREAD from 10m to 5m to create new pollard. Reason: multi-stemmed tree has had a major stem failure exposing large cavity approx.2m above gd level. Remaining stem above cavity is weighted towards neighbouring properties and a crown reduction to reduce weight and sail above cavity is urgently needed to minimise risk of future failures. Merely reducing the one stem would drastically change the balance of the overall canopy and exposure to wind would be likely to cause more failures on the remaining stems. Crown reduction is required for safety to reduce overall canopy to approximately 5-6m from ground level (please see annotated photo) to create a new pollard. Informative A: thank you for managing the tree by safe reduction to retain as a low pollard for rear amenity, wildlife and canopy shade to reduce heatwave temperatures due to climate change. Informative B: please create habitat log piles with arisings for wildlife and biodiversity.