Planning application
2 LONGTON AVENUE, LONDON, SE26 6QJ
Works: Trees
Withdrawn before a decision, so it carries no planning weight. A revised scheme can be submitted at any time.
Proposal
2 Longton Avenue, London, SE26 6QJ. Side Garden - ONE Ash Lateral Reeducation to Give a two meter Clearance of the Building.
As published by the council, reference DC/11/78607
Application record
- Reference
- DC/11/78607
- Type
- Trees in Conservation Areas
- Status
- Withdrawn
- Decision
- Withdrawn As published: Withdrawn Returned to Applicant
- Received
- 19 Oct 2011
- Validated
- 21 Oct 2011
- Decided
- 21 Oct 2011
- Ward
- Sydenham
- Postcode
- SE26 6QJ
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
19 Oct 2011
Received by Lewisham
-
21 Oct 2011
Validated
Checked as complete and ready for consideration.
-
21 Oct 2011
Decision issued: Withdrawn Returned to Applicant
-
20 Aug 2026
Added to PlanIndex
Who's behind it
Company information only, from the register and Companies House
County Tree Surgeons Ltd Agent, a tree-works contractor registered in Crawley
Active · incorporated 2001 · Crawley
83 applications on PlanIndex · across 14 councils · 100% granted
Trade members see everything this firm has filed, how it was decided, and get an email the day it files again.
See their track recordWhat withdrawal means
The applicant withdrew this application before Lewisham decided it, and is free to submit a revised scheme at any time. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.
About tree works applications
Applications for works to trees cover protected trees: consent under a tree preservation order, or six weeks notice for trees in a conservation area. More in our guide to planning application types.
Nearby applications
Within 0.3 miles
-
4 LONGTON AVENUE, LONDON, SE26 6QJ
Replacement of existing single-glazed timber windows and doors at the front, side, and rear, for double-glazed timber windows at front and side, double-glazed uPVC windows at rear, double-glazed timber doors at the front and side, and a double-glazed uPVC rear door at 4 Longton Avenue, SE26.
Granted Full applications Windows or glazing 10 docs -
8 LONGTON AVENUE, LONDON, SE26 6QJ
Installation of replacement double-glazed timber windows to the front and side elevations and double-glazed uPVC windows to the rear and side elevations at 8 Longton Avenue, SE26.
Granted Full applications Windows or glazing 9 docs -
14 LONGTON AVENUE, LONDON, SE26 6QJ
The construction of a part single/part two storey extension to the side of 14 Longton Avenue SE26, together with 2 Velux type roof lights in the rear roof slope.
Refused Full applications Extension Loft or dormer 2 docs -
14 LONGTON AVENUE, LONDON, SE26 6QJ
The construction of a part single/part two storey extension to the side of 14 Longton Avenue SE26, together with 2 Velux type roof lights in the rear roof slope.
Refused Full applications Extension Loft or dormer 2 docs -
12 LONGTON AVENUE, LONDON, SE26 6QJ
Certificate of Lawfulness (Proposed) for the replacement of an existing rear lean to roof at 12 Longton Avenue, SE26. Incorporating the insertion of two rooflights.
Granted Lawful development Loft or dormer 6 docs -
6 Longton Avenue, London, SE266QJ
The construction of a portico to the front of 6 Longton Avenue SE26.
Granted Full applications
Other tree works applications
In Lewisham
-
DC/26/145119 Awaiting decision
43 DEVONSHIRE ROAD, LONDON, SE23 3EN
FRONT: ONE Lime tree (T1) Ht 15m FELL to ground level & treat stump REASON: A remedy to the differential foundation movement at the insured property and to ensure the long-term stability of the building. To limit the extent and need for expensive and disruptive engineering repair works at the insured property. To limit the extent and need for costly CO2e emissions relating to alternative engineering repair works at the insured property. It is the case that an alternative to felling such as pruning or significant 'pollarding' of the tree would not provide a reliable or sustainable remedy to the subsidence in this case. We do not consider that any other potential means of mitigation, including root barriers, would be effective or appropriate in the circumstances. We are satisfied that the evidence obtained following completion of our Arboricultural Implication Assessment report completed 31/01/2024 clearly links the Lime T1 and False Acacia T2 as the cause of damage to the risk address. REPLANTING: Insurers understanding the requirement to offer replacement planting in the event consent to fell is granted. 43 DEVONSHIRE ROAD TREE PRESERVATION ORDER 2024 DC/24/135159
-
DC/26/145120 Awaiting decision
45A DEVONSHIRE ROAD, LONDON, SE23 3EN
FRONT: ONE False Acacia tree (T2) Ht 10m FELL to ground level and treat stump with eco plugs (broadleaved). REASON: Proposed as a remedy to the differential foundation movement at the insured property and to ensure the long-term stability of the building. The above tree works are proposed to limit the extent and need for expensive and disruptive engineering repair works at the insured property It is the case that an alternative to felling such as pruning or significant 'pollarding' of the tree would not provide a reliable or sustainable remedy to the subsidence in this case. We do not consider that any other potential means of mitigation, including root barriers, would be effective or appropriate in the circumstances. We are satisfied that the evidence obtained following completion of our Arboricultural Implication Assessment report completed 31/01/2024 clearly links the Lime T1 and False Acacia T2 as the cause of damage to the risk address. REPLANTING: Insurers understanding the requirement to offer replacement planting in the event consent to fell is granted. 45 DEVONSHIRE ROAD TREE PRESERVATION ORDER DC/24/136999
-
DC/26/144620 Granted
249A KIRKDALE, LONDON, SE26 4QD
FRONT: THREE Lime (T1,T2,T3)(ht.7-8m) carefully re pollard the crown back to old points aproximately 3 metres of regrowth FRONT: ONE hornbeam (T4)(ht.8m) reduce the overall size of crown by 3 metres. These trees are causing excessive shading
-
DC/26/144984 Granted
9 EXETER PLACE, LONDON, SE26 6AB
REAR (fronting Wells Park Rd) ONE Sycamore (T2, in TPO A1)(ht.12-14m) FELL by dismantling to safe standing stem or high stump. Reason: health & safety, the tree is in severe physiological and structural decline, leaning towards the road, several branches have already failed, and although a small amount of live growth remains, the tree has no meaningful long-term viability, the significantly compromised structure presents an unacceptable risk of further branch or whole-tree failure onto highway. The proposed removal is necessary to eliminate the risk. The replacement tree is to be a large canopy species planted as near as practicable to the original location. The County of London (Lewisham No.2) Tree Preservation Order, 1957. Informative A: thank you for proposing 4x replacement trees, 1x is required to be a large canopy tree to replace the TPO tree and to maintain the treed boundary character to Wells Park Road for public streetscape amenity, wildlife and shade to reduce increasingly high summer temperatures due to climate change ? Hornbeam, Hop hornbeam, sessile oak, Japanese Pagoda Tree, walnut (Juglans regia), Italian alder or grey alder, Caucasian Elm (Zelkova carpinifolia), small leaved lime, Hackberry (Celtis australis), Turkish hazel (Corylus colurna), Kentucky Coffee Tree (Gymnocladus dioica) - see further planting details below. Informative B: thank you for planting additional voluntary trees for screening, to improve species diversity, and the setting of the property. Informative C: thank you also for looking to retain a safe standing stem/high stump and creating habitat log piles with some dead wood arisings for wildlife and biodiversity.
-
DC/26/144936 Granted
12 PRINCETHORPE ROAD, LONDON, SE26 4PF
REAR: ONE Lombardy Poplar (T1)(ht.16m) CROWN REDUCE by 10-11m to ht.5-6m, REDUCE SPREAD from 10m to 5m to create new pollard. Reason: multi-stemmed tree has had a major stem failure exposing large cavity approx.2m above gd level. Remaining stem above cavity is weighted towards neighbouring properties and a crown reduction to reduce weight and sail above cavity is urgently needed to minimise risk of future failures. Merely reducing the one stem would drastically change the balance of the overall canopy and exposure to wind would be likely to cause more failures on the remaining stems. Crown reduction is required for safety to reduce overall canopy to approximately 5-6m from ground level (please see annotated photo) to create a new pollard. Informative A: thank you for managing the tree by safe reduction to retain as a low pollard for rear amenity, wildlife and canopy shade to reduce heatwave temperatures due to climate change. Informative B: please create habitat log piles with arisings for wildlife and biodiversity.