Planning application
20, Tetley Drive, Birkenshaw, BD11 2NB
Works: Extension Small domestic
Read from the description, not a valuation. How we read the register
Refused. Only the applicant can appeal, within the statutory time limit, and a revised scheme can be submitted instead.
Proposal
The proposal is for erection of single storey rear extension. The extension projects 3.75m beyond the rear wall of the original dwellinghouse. The maximum height of the extension is 3.4m, the height of the eaves of the extension is 2.5m
As published by the council, reference 2020/90405
Application record
- Reference
- 2020/90405
- Type
- Outline
- Status
- Rejected
- Decision
- REFUSED
- Received
- 7 Feb 2020
- Validated
- 7 Feb 2020
- Decided
- 18 Mar 2020
- Ward
- Birstall and Birkenshaw
- Postcode
- BD11 2NB
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
7 Feb 2020
Received by Kirklees
-
18 Mar 2020
Decision issued: REFUSED
-
7 Aug 2026
Added to PlanIndex
Documents
Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report
8 documents on file for this application
A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.
Trade members open them from here.
Open the documentsWhat this refusal means
Kirklees refused this application for the reasons on the decision notice; only the applicant can appeal, and refused schemes often return in revised form. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.
About outline applications
An outline application tests the principle of developing a site, holding back details such as appearance and landscaping as reserved matters for later approval. More in our guide to planning application types.
Nearby applications
Within 500 metres
-
26, Tetley Drive, Birkenshaw, BD11 2NB
Erection of rear extension
Decided Full applications Extension 7 docs -
rear of, 8, Grove Terrace, Birkenshaw, BD11 2LY
Erection of detached dwelling with associated parking
Decided Full applications New dwelling 20 docsDomestic -
13, Tetley Drive, Birkenshaw, Bradford, BD11 2NB
Erection of single storey side extension
Decided Full applications Extension 9 docsSmall domestic -
8, Grove Terrace, Birkenshaw, Bradford, BD11 2LY
Discharge of conditions 8. (drainage) and 10. (bat roosting and bird nesting) on previous permission no. 2021/91599 for detached dwelling house with associated parking and garden space
Granted Conditions New dwelling 5 docsDomestic -
rear of, 8, Grove Terrace, Birkenshaw, BD11 2LY
Non-material amendment to previous permission 2020/91522 for erection of detached dwelling with associated parking
Refused Amendments New dwelling 5 docsDomestic -
37, Tetley Drive, Birkenshaw, BD11 2NB
0% historically approved · decision due ~10 Sep
Erection of single storey side extension with porch
Status unknown Full applications Extension 6 docsSmall domestic
Other outline applications
In Kirklees
-
2026/92452 Status unknown
146, Weatherhill Road, Birchencliffe, Huddersfield, HD3 3QY
The proposal is for erection of single storey rear extension. The extension projects 5m beyond the rear wall of the original dwellinghouse. The maximum height of the extension is 3.8m, the height of the eaves of the extension is 2.2m
-
2026/91934 Refused
14, Park Drive, Huddersfield, HD1 4EB
Prior notification for change of use from commercial/business/service to one dwelling (within a Conservation Area)
-
2026/92412 Status unknown
Land Off, Ashbrow Road, Fartown, Huddersfield, HD2 1DU
Prior notification for installation of a 20 metre Valmont Phase 7.2 streetworks monopole that incorporates a wraparound cabinet, 3no additional equipment cabinets, 9no stacked antennas, 1no 300mm transmission dish, 2no. GPS nodes and ancillary equipment
-
2026/92022 Granted
Glendale Mills, Sheffield Road, New Mill, Holmfirth, HD9 7EN
Overhead lines application for replacement of existing open wire conductors in favour of aerial bunched conductor
-
2026/92018 Granted
Fieldhead Lane, Holme, Holmfirth, HD9 2QJ
Overhead lines application for replacement of existing open wire conductors in favour of aerial bunched conductor