Planning application
land at, Marlwood, Greenside Road, Mirfield, WF14 0AS
Works: New dwelling
Decided. The decision notice on the council portal carries the outcome in full, including any conditions.
Proposal
Outline application for erection of residential development
As published by the council, reference 2019/92525
Application record
- Reference
- 2019/92525
- Type
- Outline
- Status
- Conditions
- Decision
- CONDITIONAL OUTLINE PERMISSION
- Received
- 29 Jul 2019
- Validated
- 30 Jul 2019
- Decided
- 6 Feb 2020
- Ward
- Mirfield Ward
- Postcode
- WF14 0AS
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
29 Jul 2019
Received by Kirklees
-
30 Jul 2019
Validated
Checked as complete and ready for consideration.
-
6 Feb 2020
Decision issued: CONDITIONAL OUTLINE PERMISSION
-
17 Aug 2026
Added to PlanIndex
Documents
Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report
12 documents on file for this application
A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.
Trade members open them from here.
Open the documentsAfter the decision
Kirklees has decided this application; the outcome above is the register's own wording and the decision notice on the council portal carries the detail. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.
About outline applications
An outline application tests the principle of developing a site, holding back details such as appearance and landscaping as reserved matters for later approval. More in our guide to planning application types.
Nearby applications
Within 500 metres
-
8, Greenside Mount, Mirfield, WF14 0AY
Erection of first floor side, single storey rear and front canopy extensions
Decided Full applications Extension 11 docsSmall domestic -
101, Greenside Road, Mirfield, WF14 0AR
The proposal is for erection of single storey rear extension. The extension projects 3.5m beyond the rear wall of the original dwellinghouse., The maximum height of the extension is 3.795m, the height of the eaves of the extension is 2.75m
Decided Outline Extension 8 docsSmall domestic -
70, Greenside Road, Mirfield, WF14 0AR
The proposal is for a single storey rear extension The extension projects 4 metres beyond the rear wall of the original dwellinghouse The maximum height of the extension is 3.7 metres The height of the eaves of the extension is 2.4 metres
Decided Outline Extension 6 docsSmall domestic -
60, Greenside Road, Mirfield, WF14 0AR
Erection of two storey and single storey rear extensions
Decided Full applications Extension 10 docsSmall domestic -
Moravian Church, Wellhouse, Mirfield, WF14 0AN
Work to trees with TPO 11/08
Split decision Trees 4 docs -
Wellhouse Farm Barn, Wellhouse, Mirfield, WF14 0AN
Erection of boundary fence above existing stone wall (Listed Building)
Withdrawn Full applications 5 docsSmall domestic
Other outline applications
In Kirklees
-
2026/92452 Status unknown
146, Weatherhill Road, Birchencliffe, Huddersfield, HD3 3QY
The proposal is for erection of single storey rear extension. The extension projects 5m beyond the rear wall of the original dwellinghouse. The maximum height of the extension is 3.8m, the height of the eaves of the extension is 2.2m
-
2026/91934 Refused
14, Park Drive, Huddersfield, HD1 4EB
Prior notification for change of use from commercial/business/service to one dwelling (within a Conservation Area)
-
2026/92412 Status unknown
Land Off, Ashbrow Road, Fartown, Huddersfield, HD2 1DU
Prior notification for installation of a 20 metre Valmont Phase 7.2 streetworks monopole that incorporates a wraparound cabinet, 3no additional equipment cabinets, 9no stacked antennas, 1no 300mm transmission dish, 2no. GPS nodes and ancillary equipment
-
2026/92022 Granted
Glendale Mills, Sheffield Road, New Mill, Holmfirth, HD9 7EN
Overhead lines application for replacement of existing open wire conductors in favour of aerial bunched conductor
-
2026/92018 Granted
Fieldhead Lane, Holme, Holmfirth, HD9 2QJ
Overhead lines application for replacement of existing open wire conductors in favour of aerial bunched conductor