Planning application
P2026/1760/TRE
80, Gifford Street, London, N1 0DF
Proposal
T1 Oak (Turkey) Remove The tree works are proposed to stop the influence of the tree(s) on the soil below building foundation level and provide long term stability.to 80 Gifford Street London N1 0DF Estimated costs of repair to the building are £65,000.00 if the influence of the tree(s) remain and £26,598.81 if the proposed tree works are allowed to proceed. Granting permission will limit these costs. In the event of a refusal we, or our clients, will seek to secure compensation for the additional costs incurred through Section 202(e). Should the tree/s remain the total cost of repairs will be the Superstructural repairs + Alternative method of repairs = £91,598.81 It is the expert opinion of both the case engineer and arboriculturalist that on the balance of probabilities the supporting information demonstrates the influence of the tree(s). Note: Further monitoring results may be submitted if these become available during the course of this application.
As published by the council, reference P2026/1760/TRE
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
2 Jul 2026
Received by Islington
-
9 Jul 2026
Validated
Checked as complete and ready for consideration.
-
24 Jul 2026
Added to PlanIndex
-
Decision
Awaiting decision
The statutory target is eight weeks for most applications and thirteen for major development. Extensions of time are common.
What happens while it is decided
The process from here
This application is with Islington for determination. The council publicises it, consults neighbours and technical bodies where required, and weighs the responses against local and national planning policy.
The statutory target is eight weeks for most applications and thirteen for major development, though extensions of time are common. Comments carry most weight while the case is undecided, so check the council portal for the deadline if you want to respond.
About trees applications
How this application type works
Tree applications cover work to protected trees: those under a tree preservation order need consent for pruning or felling, and trees in a conservation area need six weeks written notice before work starts. The council assesses the amenity value of the tree and can refuse consent, approve it with conditions, or in conservation areas make a preservation order in response.
Nearby applications
Within 500 metres
-
P2024/2065/FUL Granted
St Williams Court, 1 Gifford Street, London, N1 0GN
Installation of no.1 air conditioning unit to existing undercroft to serve flat 105.
-
P2026/0061/TRE Awaiting decision
94, Gifford Street, London, N1 0DF
T1 - ash tree (12m) to the rear of 94 Gifford Street - reduce crown to previous pruning points, approximately 4m reduction and remove epicormic shoots from main stems and limbs.
-
P2019/3747/OUT Withdrawn
30-40 Vale Royal, Islington, London, N7 9AP
Outline planning application for the demolition of the existing buildings and the construction of a new building (maximum height 29.4 metres) to provide for a maximum of 5,861 square metres (GIA) of business use floorspace (Use Class B1 (a)/(b)/(c))/storage and distribution (Use Class B8) floorspace, of which a minimum of 1,982 square metres(GIA) to be provided for light industry (Use Class B1(c))/ storage and distribution (Use Class B8) floorspace, and the submission of details for access but details for appearance, landscaping, layout and scale reserved.
-
P2025/2582/FUL Awaiting decision
303 - 307 Caledonian Road, London, N1 1DT
Proposed service hatch installed to existing shopfront.
-
P2025/1301/COL Awaiting decision
297, Kennedy's Public House, Caledonian Road, London, N1 1EG
Certificate of Lawfulness (Existing) to confirm lawful use at first and second floor levels as 4no. self-contained flats (Use Class C3)
-
P2025/1379/S73 Awaiting decision
57 - 65, Land At, Randell's Road, London
Section 73 application for the variation of Condition 2 (Drawings and Documents) of Planning Permission Ref: P2015/2834/FUL dated 07/12/2015 (as amend by P2024/0186/NMA dated 8th May 2024). The variation to the approved plans sought include replacing the originally approved drawings with revised plans showing overall height increase along with internal and external alterations.
Other trees applications
In Islington
-
P2026/1697/TRE Granted
24, Furlong Road, London, N7 8LS
T1. False Acacia. Mature tree with significant dieback throughout canopy. History of shedding branches. Dieback from canopy tips indicating rooting disorder. No Safe useful life expectancy. Fell to ground level. Replant with x1 standard tree 12/14cm in girth in following planting season.
-
P2026/1874/TRE Awaiting decision
62, Aberdeen Park, London, N5 2BL
Trees Located in rear garden T1 - Birch - reduce crown to points of previous reduction (1.5m approx. branch removal) T2, T3 - Limes - Reduce crowns to points of previous reduction (2m approx. branch removal) This work is proposed to continue the regular management cycle of these trees in line with good arboricultural practise
-
P2026/1866/TRE Awaiting decision
2, Hanbury Mews, London, N1 7DW
T2, T3 Walnut, crown reduce to most recent points, approx. 1.5m. Cyclical maintenance.
-
P2026/1764/TRE Granted
62 Northchurch Road, London, N1 3NY
T1 - Front garden - Tilla sp Crown lift lower canopy to approximately 4 metres above ground level to improve light levels to the ground floor window whilst maintaining a balanced crown structure. Reduce crown back from the building to provide approximately 2 metres clearance from the structure. Reduce upper canopy by approximately 2–3 metres from branch ends, pruning to suitable growth points throughout. Works to retain as much healthy internal foliage as reasonably practicable, with the objective of managing the overall size of the tree whilst encouraging regrowth within the upper crown and reducing the development of aggressive basal and epicormic growth. Tree previously managed as a high pollard
-
P2026/1357/TRE Granted
355 Camden Road, London
T3 Ash of the submitted MWA Arboricultural Report Works: Remove (fell) to near ground level and treat stump to inhibit regrowth. Reason: Clay shrinkage subsidence damage at the subject property.