Planning application
P2026/0981/TRE
123 Highbury New Park, London
Proposal
The eucalyptus tree is causing ongoing and progressive structural damage to the property. A structural engineer’s report (attached) confirms that the tree’s proximity to the building (approximately 2.44 metres from the rear extension) and its high water demand are resulting in significant soil moisture extraction from shrinkable London Clay beneath shallow foundations. This has led to repeated cycles of clay shrinkage and rehydration, causing differential ground movement that is manifesting as cracking to the rear extension, internal walls, external masonry and associated retaining walls. The cracking is structural in nature, has reappeared following previous repairs, and is actively worsening following seasonal weather changes, demonstrating that the underlying cause remains unresolved. The report further identifies deformation and cracking of the adjacent retaining wall, which is being exacerbated by ground movement and fluctuating soil moisture conditions associated with the tree. It concludes that remedial works to the building and retaining structures will not be effective unless the influence of the tree is removed, and that continued retention of the eucalyptus will result in ongoing and potentially increasing damage. On this basis, the structural engineer considers the tree to be a material and significant contributing factor to the damage currently occurring and recommends its removal as a necessary prerequisite to stabilising the property and preventing further deterioration. Species: Eucalyptus (gum tree) Quantity: One (1) Location: Rear garden of the property, positioned approximately 2.44m from the rear extension retaining wall and shallow foundations. Description: Mature eucalyptus tree with a substantial canopy and trunk diameter consistent with maturity (as shown and described in the attached structural engineer’s report). Proposed works: Removal of one mature eucalyptus tree. Method: Controlled and staged removal, commencing with crown reduction followed by phased removal of the main stem, in accordance with the recommendations set out in the attached structural engineer’s report. Stump treatment: The stump to be cut down to near ground level and treated to prevent regrowth. Full stump grubbing is not proposed at this stage to avoid sudden soil disturbance and rapid rehydration of shrinkable clay soils. Reasoning: The staged approach is intended to manage the risk of post-removal ground heave and to allow gradual rebalancing of soil moisture conditions.
As published by the council, reference P2026/0981/TRE
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
14 Apr 2026
Received by Islington
-
20 Apr 2026
Validated
Checked as complete and ready for consideration.
-
30 Apr 2026
Decision issued: Tree Works - Auto Permit
-
25 Jul 2026
Added to PlanIndex
What a grant of permission means
The process from here
Permission has been granted, usually subject to conditions listed on the decision notice, some of which must be discharged before work starts. The decision notice on the council portal sets out exactly what was approved.
Work must normally begin within three years of the decision or the permission lapses. Neighbours cannot appeal a grant; challenging one means judicial review of how the decision was made, within tight time limits.
About trees applications
How this application type works
Tree applications cover work to protected trees: those under a tree preservation order need consent for pruning or felling, and trees in a conservation area need six weeks written notice before work starts. The council assesses the amenity value of the tree and can refuse consent, approve it with conditions, or in conservation areas make a preservation order in response.
Nearby applications
Within 500 metres
-
P2023/0457/TRE Granted
119 Highbury New Park, London, N5 2HG
Rear garden Ash (T1) - Whole crown reduction by 3-4m (pruning cuts are not extend below the last, most recent crown reduction points). Front garden Fatsia Japonica (T2)* - Fell due to Structural Engineer advice and replace with the same. *Council consent is not required for the removal of a shrub such as this one. .
-
P2026/0174/FUL Granted
Flat C, 5 Stradbroke Road, London, N5 2PZ
Erection of rear dormer roof extension (with inset balcony), replacement roof tiles, installation two front rooflights and replacement windows to front elevation (second floor level).
-
P2024/2453/FUL Granted
21 Highbury Grange, London, N5 2QA
Rear extension at lower ground & upper ground floor. Reconstruction of the existing rear outrigger. Replacement of existing single glazed timber sash windows with double glazed timber sash windows. Replacement of the existing roof and replacement of front and rear dormers. Enlarge existing front lightwell. Installation of PV panels to front roofslope. Installation of ASHP to rear garden.
-
P2023/0580/TRE Granted
133 Highbury New Park, London, N5 2DS
Rear garden (T1) Sycamore - reduce crown to points of previous reduction - 2m approx. reduction (T2 - T3) Sycamores x2 - prune/reduce lateral branches growing towards building to rear by 2-3m
-
P2026/0755/FUL Granted
35 Kelross Road, London, N5 2QS
Erection of front and rear dormer windows with installation of rooflights to the front and side roof slope and raising of the ridge line.
-
P2025/2575/TRE Awaiting decision
133, Highbury New Park, London
T1 - Sycamore - reduce crown to points of previous reduction (1-1.5m branch length removal) T2, 3, 4 - Sycamores - Reduce height and overlong lateral branches by 3-4m. Reduce remaining lateral growth by 1-2m
Other trees applications
In Islington
-
P2026/1697/TRE Granted
24, Furlong Road, London, N7 8LS
T1. False Acacia. Mature tree with significant dieback throughout canopy. History of shedding branches. Dieback from canopy tips indicating rooting disorder. No Safe useful life expectancy. Fell to ground level. Replant with x1 standard tree 12/14cm in girth in following planting season.
-
P2026/1874/TRE Awaiting decision
62, Aberdeen Park, London, N5 2BL
Trees Located in rear garden T1 - Birch - reduce crown to points of previous reduction (1.5m approx. branch removal) T2, T3 - Limes - Reduce crowns to points of previous reduction (2m approx. branch removal) This work is proposed to continue the regular management cycle of these trees in line with good arboricultural practise
-
P2026/1866/TRE Awaiting decision
2, Hanbury Mews, London, N1 7DW
T2, T3 Walnut, crown reduce to most recent points, approx. 1.5m. Cyclical maintenance.
-
P2026/1764/TRE Granted
62 Northchurch Road, London, N1 3NY
T1 - Front garden - Tilla sp Crown lift lower canopy to approximately 4 metres above ground level to improve light levels to the ground floor window whilst maintaining a balanced crown structure. Reduce crown back from the building to provide approximately 2 metres clearance from the structure. Reduce upper canopy by approximately 2–3 metres from branch ends, pruning to suitable growth points throughout. Works to retain as much healthy internal foliage as reasonably practicable, with the objective of managing the overall size of the tree whilst encouraging regrowth within the upper crown and reducing the development of aggressive basal and epicormic growth. Tree previously managed as a high pollard
-
P2026/1357/TRE Granted
355 Camden Road, London
T3 Ash of the submitted MWA Arboricultural Report Works: Remove (fell) to near ground level and treat stump to inhibit regrowth. Reason: Clay shrinkage subsidence damage at the subject property.