Kleffens House Bouldnor Road Yarmouth Isle Of Wight PO41 0UR

1. 7 Aug 2026

   Received by Isle of Wight

2. 12 Aug 2026

   Validated

   Checked as complete and ready for consideration.

3. 13 Aug 2026

   Added to PlanIndex

4. Decision

   Awaiting decision

   Decision expected by 7 October 2026, 8 weeks from validation under the statutory target for most applications. Extensions of time are common and are agreed case by case.

   Isle of Wight took a median of 57 days over the applications it decided in the last year.

This application is with Isle of Wight for determination, against a statutory target of eight weeks. Over the last year Isle of Wight's median decision took 57 days. More in our guide to how long planning decisions take.

The published feed does not state which type of application this is; the register entry on Isle of Wight's portal will say. Our guide explains the common types.

• Breezes Bouldnor Road Shalfleet Yarmouth Isle Of Wight PO41 0UR

  26/00810/HOU Submitted 11 Jun 2026 0m away

  94% historically approved · decision due ~6 Aug

  Demolition of garage, Proposed single and two storey side/rear extension and extended decking area; outbuilding with decking area

  Decided Householder Extension Demolition 22 docs
  Small domestic

• Netherby Bouldnor Road Shalfleet Yarmouth Isle Of Wight PO41 0UR

  24/01536/TW Submitted 9 Oct 2024 170m away

  Pine - Lift crown to give 5.5m clearance from the carriageway. Reduce the limbs by 1.5 metres to suitable branch points; Lift the west side limbs by 4 metres away from the hedge; Deadwood the tree.

  Granted Trees 7 docs

• Westward Thorley Road Yarmouth Isle Of Wight PO41 0SH

  25/01832/HOU Submitted 19 Dec 2025 218m away

  Proposed alterations and two storey rear extension (part room-in-roof); 2 no. front facing dormer windows and entrance porch; general roof and wall material changes

  Granted Householder Extension Loft or dormer +1 13 docs
  Small domestic

• Downs View Thorley Road Yarmouth Isle Of Wight PO41 0SH

  26/00562/TW Submitted 27 Apr 2026 231m away

  T1; Macrocarpa: (See photos for reference) - Reduce the top of the crown in height by approx. 2 metres; Crown to the west reduce by approx. 1.5 to 2 metres, reducing the crown over-extended branches back into the general crown mass; Crown to the east reduce by 1 to 1.5 metres, removing the over-extended crown back into the general crown mass; Crown is to be left in a natural form, where possible, more balanced. Top of the crown should be reduced by approx. 2 metres. This being approximately the same height as the tree with a slight lean; Southern side of the crown be reduced by up to approx. 3 metres. Bringing the overextended branches back into the general crown mass; Northern side of the crown is to be reduced by no more than 1 metre to form a natural form with the reduction from the east and west; The crown is to be left in a natural form. The branch highlighted in purple is to be removed; Reduce in height the top of the smallest diameter tree stem, leaning NE towards the house, to the point where the first branch (from the top down) extending ESE meets the trunk (approximately 2m reduction).

  Granted Trees 5 docs

• Downs View Thorley Road Yarmouth Isle Of Wight PO41 0SH

  26/00169/TW Submitted 5 Feb 2026 270m away

  T1; Macrocarpa - Fell. Reason: Leaning downwind and threat of failure. T2 and T3; Macrocarpa - Reduce in height by 40%. Reason: Fear of failure.

  Refused Trees 9 docs

• Seahaven Port La Salle Bouldnor Isle Of Wight PO41 0YP

  26/00957/TW Submitted 15 Jul 2026 340m away

  91% historically approved · decision due ~9 Sep

  Amendment to proposal: T1; Conifer - Remove the south-facing codominant lateral stem in its entirety, back to its point of origin on the main stem; Carry out an additional reduction to the tips of selected branches by approximately 1.5 metres; Make pruning cuts back to suitable growth points in accordance with good arboricultural practice. Reason: The lateral stem has formed a weak codominant union and carries significant lateral and end weight. This creates an increased risk of structural failure and the stem tearing out, particularly during periods of high wind. Pruning to be undertaken to maintain the overall balance and proportion of the remaining stem and crown. T2; Lime Tree - Remove close to ground level. Reason: The tree has developed a pronounced lean, resulting in significant asymmetric loading through the main stem and root plate. The base displays substantial adaptive growth, including a visibly enlarged and bulging root system, suggesting the tree has been responding to prolonged structural loading. Due to the extent of the lean and the continued loading placed upon the stem base and root plate; removal is proposed to prevent the tree becoming an increased structural concern as it continues to mature.

  Decided Trees 11 docs