Planning application
59 CHESTNUT CLOSE HAYES
Works: Extension Small domestic
Read from the description, not a valuation. How we read the register
Refused. Only the applicant can appeal, within the statutory time limit, and a revised scheme can be submitted instead.
Proposal
Erection of a single storey rear extension.
As published by the council, reference 34278/APP/2026/1952
Application record
- Reference
- 34278/APP/2026/1952
- Status
- Refusal
- Decision
- Refused As published: Refusal
- Received
- 7 Aug 2026
- Validated
- 7 Aug 2026
- Decided
- 1 Oct 2026
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
7 Aug 2026
Received by Hillingdon
-
19 Aug 2026
Added to PlanIndex
-
1 Oct 2026
Decision issued: Refusal
Who's behind it
Company information only, from the register and Companies House
Hiral Patel Sustainable Renew Homes Ltd. Agent, a developer
1 application on PlanIndex
Trade members see everything this firm has filed, how it was decided, and get an email the day it files again.
See their track recordWhat this refusal means
Hillingdon refused this application for the reasons on the decision notice; only the applicant can appeal, and refused schemes often return in revised form. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.
About this record
The published feed does not state which type of application this is; the register entry on Hillingdon's portal will say. Our guide explains the common types.