Skip to content
PlanIndex Get alerts
Menu

Planning application

3 Rosedene Gardens Fleet GU51 4NQ

Refused Hart 24/00219/TPO Works to Trees Covered by a TPO

Works: Trees

Refused. Only the applicant can appeal, within the statutory time limit, and a revised scheme can be submitted instead.

Proposal

T1 Sweet Chestnut - Re-pollard to previous reduction points

As published by the council, reference 24/00219/TPO

Application record

Reference
24/00219/TPO
Type
Works to Trees Covered by a TPO
Status
Refuse
Decision
Refused As published: Refuse
Received
30 Jan 2024
Validated
30 Jan 2024
Decided
13 Mar 2024
Ward
Fleet West
Parish
Fleet Parish
Decision by
Delegated Decision
Postcode
GU51 4NQ

Site history

Applications at this address on the Hart register

This site has had 5 applications since 2020: 2 approved, 2 refused.

  • 26/00133/TPO Granted

    3 Rosedene Gardens Fleet GU51 4NQ

    T1122 - Sweet Chestnut - Reduce lateral branches on south facing side back to previous reduction points.

    Decided 23 Mar 2026 Trees
  • 24/00683/TPO Refused

    3 Rosedene Gardens Fleet GU51 4NQ

    T1 Chestnut - Repollard to previous reduction points.

    Decided 16 May 2024 Trees
  • 23/02500/PDTEL Decided

    3 Rosedene Gardens Fleet GU51 4NQ

    intention to install poles / cabinets at the above location - Pole

    Decided 19 Dec 2023 Telecoms
  • 20/02254/TPO Granted

    3 Rosedene Gardens Fleet GU51 4NQ

    T1 - Sweet Chestnut - Reduce lateral growth on the south side of the tree, over hanging the garden, by 1-2m back to previous points, on the garden side, and reduce lateral growth on the East side of the canopy by 1-2m back to previous points, reduce height by 1-2m, to balance lateral reduction into shape the tree. - Crown lift lower growth to allow 1m clearance of the Cherry Laurel Hedge beneath. The works have been requested to manage the tree and prevent it from becoming on overbearing on the previous reduction points, from 2016.

    Decided 4 Nov 2020 Trees

Timeline

Dates from the published record

  1. 30 Jan 2024

    Received by Hart

  2. 13 Mar 2024

    Decision issued: Refuse

  3. 16 Sep 2026

    Added to PlanIndex

Documents

Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report

3 documents on file for this application

A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.

Watch members (£5 a month) open the document list from here.

Open the documents

What this refusal means

Hart refused this application for the reasons on the decision notice; only the applicant can appeal, and refused schemes often return in revised form. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.

About tree works applications

Applications for works to trees cover protected trees: consent under a tree preservation order, or six weeks notice for trees in a conservation area. More in our guide to planning application types.

Nearby applications

Within 0.3 miles

  • 6 Rosedene Gardens Fleet Hampshire GU51 4NQ

    24/00695/TPO Submitted 5 Apr 2024 50 yards away

    A - Sycamore - Reduce height by 2-3m and lateral spread by up to 2m leaving a finished height of 15-18m and a finished lateral spread of 2-3m and remove Ivy and deadwood

    Split decision Trees 12 docs
  • 4 Rosedene Gardens Fleet GU51 4NQ

    24/00697/TPO Submitted 5 Apr 2024 50 yards away

    B - Holly - Reduce height by up to 2m and eastern lateral growth by around 2-3m retaining a minimum of 1m growth to the east

    Granted Trees 13 docs
  • 4 Rosedene Gardens Fleet Hampshire GU51 4NQ

    20/02663/TPO Submitted 30 Oct 2020 50 yards away

    T1: Holly - Reduce in height by approximately 3 metres leaving a retained height of approximately 6-7 metres and reduce the remaining lateral growth by approximately 2 meters leaving a retained branch length of approximately 3 metres. The above works are to re reduce the crown and establish a more compact and manageable crown and to maintain the tree at a suitable size for its location.

    Granted Trees 3 docs
  • 3 Rosedene Gardens Fleet GU51 4NQ

    26/00133/TPO Submitted 26 Jan 2026 50 yards away

    T1122 - Sweet Chestnut - Reduce lateral branches on south facing side back to previous reduction points.

    Granted Trees 4 docs
  • 2 Rosedene Gardens Fleet Hampshire GU51 4NQ

    22/01896/TPO Submitted 15 Aug 2022 50 yards away

    1. Ceder Tree - Reducing the length of branches by up to 2 m to provide clearance from structures

    Granted Trees 7 docs
  • 3 Rosedene Gardens Fleet GU51 4NQ

    24/00683/TPO Submitted 4 Apr 2024 50 yards away

    T1 Chestnut - Repollard to previous reduction points.

    Refused Trees 3 docs

In Hart

  • 26/01900/TPO Awaiting decision

    Hassets Stockton Avenue Fleet Hampshire GU51 4NP

    T1. Beech - Reduce the lateral limbs over-hanging/touching the roof by 2-3m to prevent any damage to building. T2. Lime - Reduce back to its previous reduction points (4-5m) to prevent included unions failing. T3. Beech - Clean out the canopy by removal of crossing branches & basal growth & raise canopy to give 5m clearance to allow more light to under storey plants. T4. Lime - Clean out the canopy by removal of crossing branches & epicormic/basal growth.

    Trees
  • 26/01901/TPO Awaiting decision

    38 Albany Road Fleet Hampshire GU51 3PT

    T1. Oak - Fell as it has acute Oak decline. There are several spots of bacterial weeping & signs of die back through out the canopy.

    Trees
  • 26/01888/TPO Awaiting decision

    20 Levignen Close Church Crookham Fleet Hampshire GU52 0TW

    T1. Alder - 1m reduction T2. Liquid Amber - 1m height reduction T3. Maple - 1m height reduction T4. Maple - 1m height reduction

    Trees
  • 26/01884/TPO Awaiting decision

    30 Bowenhurst Road Church Crookham Fleet GU52 6HS

    TG1 Sweet Chestnut - Reduce to clear property of 12 Moore Close by up to 2m to natural target pruning points no further than boundary.

    Trees
  • 26/01880/TPO Awaiting decision

    31 Bartons Drive Yateley Hampshire GU46 6DW

    T1 and T2- Oak - Remove due to unacceptable risk

    Trees