Planning application
26/P/00720
Rose Cottage, Polesden Lane, Ripley, Woking, GU23 6DX
Proposal
Certificate of lawfulness for a proposed development to establish whether the erection of ground floor garage, extended gravel drive and gym/studio would be lawful
As published by the council, reference 26/P/00720
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
28 May 2026
Received by Guildford
-
24 Jul 2026
Decision issued: Refuse
-
30 Jul 2026
Added to PlanIndex
What refusal means
The process from here
The council refused this application for the reasons set out on the decision notice, which the council portal holds in full. Only the applicant can appeal a refusal; the time limit runs from the decision date and is shorter for householder schemes.
Refusal does not prevent a fresh attempt. Applicants often address the reasons for refusal and resubmit, so a refused scheme is not necessarily the end of proposals for the site.
About lawful development applications
How this application type works
A lawful development certificate is a legal determination, not a planning judgement. It asks the council to confirm either that existing use or works are lawful, often through the passage of time, or that a proposal would not need planning permission at all. The applicant must prove the facts; the merits of the scheme are not considered.
Nearby applications
Within 500 metres
-
20/EC/00103/APL Awaiting decision
Land Lying to the North-West of Grafton, Polesden lane, Ripley, Woking, GU23 6DX
Enforcement Appeal; Appeal reference APP/Y3615/C/25/3363964
-
25/P/01144 Awaiting decision
The Hobbit Farm, Polesden Lane, Ripley, GU23 6DX
Certificate of lawfulness for an existing use or development to establish whether the change of use of the identified land and buildings to residential use (Use Class C3) began more than four years before the date of this application (amended description 28/08/25).
-
26/W/00034 Refused
Lundy, 10 Newark Close, Ripley, Woking, GU23 6DW
Application for prior approval under Schedule 2, Part 1 Class AA of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) (Amendment) (No. 2) Order 2020 to add an additional storey to a maximum height of 7.81m.
-
21/P/01147 Granted
Sunnymead, 11 Newark Close, Ripley, Woking, GU23 6DW
Replace an existing wooden garden store with a similar building in the same position.
-
24/P/01226 Granted
Launde, 9 Newark Close, Ripley, Woking, GU23 6DW
Hip to gable roof extension and extension of rear dormer to extend habitable accommodation in the loft. (Retrospective)
-
26/W/00050 Awaiting decision
Lundy, 10 Newark Close, Ripley, Woking, GU23 6DW
Additional storey to existing detached bungalow to create a two storey house.
Other lawful development applications
In Guildford
-
26/P/00441 Refused
26 Harvey Road, Guildford, GU1 3SE
Certificate of lawfulness for a proposed development to establish whether the formation of a permeable hardstanding within the front curtilage, minor regrading of existing ground levels to accommodate the natural slope of the site and improve visibility, installation of a permeable sub-base and surface treatment to allow for the infiltration of surface water within the site, alteration to the existing boundary treatment (limited to the formation of an opening to facilitate access) and associated edge treatments would be lawful.
-
26/P/00512 Refused
Lake House, Mill Lane, Chilworth, Guildford, GU4 8RP
Certificate of lawfulness for a proposed development to establish whether the erection of timber framed two storey barn with roof windows would be lawful
-
26/P/00755 Granted
High Ash, Portsmouth Road, Ripley, Woking, GU23 6EW
Certificate of lawfulness for proposed development to establish whether the construction of garden room would be lawful.
-
26/P/00731 Granted
Wyvern, Shere Road, West Horsley, Leatherhead, KT24 6EQ
Certificate of lawfulness for proposed development to establish whether the replacement of rear dormer roof would be lawful.
-
26/P/00756 Granted
43 Grange Road, Tongham, Farnham, GU10 1DJ
Certificate of lawfulness for proposed development to establish whether a loft conversion with L- shaped dormer would be lawful.