Planning application
Rose Cottage, Elm Corner, Ockham, Woking, GU23 6PX
Part of this application was approved and part refused. The decision notice on the council portal sets out which is which.
Proposal
Certificate of lawfulness for proposed development to establish whether the conversion of garage and office to habitable accommodation together with the installation solar panels would be lawful.
As published by the council, reference 23/P/00175
Application record
- Reference
- 23/P/00175
- Type
- C of Lawfulness for Proposed Use or Dev
- Status
- Decided
- Decision
- Part approved, part refused As published: Part Approved, Part Refused
- Received
- 1 Feb 2023
- Validated
- 1 Feb 2023
- Decided
- 22 Mar 2023
- Ward
- Lovelace
- Parish
- Ockham
- Decision by
- Delegated
- Postcode
- GU23 6PX
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
1 Feb 2023
Received by Guildford
-
22 Mar 2023
Decision issued: Part Approved, Part Refused
-
30 Jul 2026
Added to PlanIndex
Documents
Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report
8 documents on file for this application
A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.
Trade members open them from here.
Open the documentsAfter the decision
The process from here
The council has decided this application; the published outcome sits in the record above and the decision notice on the council portal carries the detail, including any conditions.
If permission was granted, work must normally begin within three years of the decision. If it was refused, the applicant can appeal within the statutory time limit or submit a revised scheme.
About lawful development applications
How this application type works
A lawful development certificate is a legal determination, not a planning judgement. It asks the council to confirm either that existing use or works are lawful, often through the passage of time, or that a proposal would not need planning permission at all. The applicant must prove the facts; the merits of the scheme are not considered.
Nearby applications
Within 500 metres
-
Wilderness Cottage, Hatch Lane, Ockham, Woking, KT11 1NR
Erection of a replacement 4-bedroom detached dwelling following demolition of existing dwelling (revision of 21/P/02204 and resubmission of withdrawn application 22/P/01024).
Refused Full applications New dwelling Demolition 36 docsDomestic
Other lawful development applications
In Guildford
-
26/P/01161 Awaiting decision
The Bungalow, Long Reach, Ockham, Woking, GU23 6PG
Certificate of lawfulness for a proposed development to establish whether the erection of two side extensions and a loft conversion including rear dormer and three front rooflights would be lawful.
-
26/P/00423 Granted
Misty Hill, Catteshall Lane, Unsted, Godalming, GU7 1UP
Certificate of Lawfulness for existing use to establish whether the use began more than 10 years before the date of this application.The building works (for instance, building or engineering works) were substantially completed more than four years before the date of this application and the change of use to use as a single dwelling house began more than four years before the date of this application is lawful.
-
26/P/00808 Refused
Sandy Farm Business Centre, Sands Road, Seale, Farnham, GU10 1PX
Certificate of lawfulness for proposed development to establish whether the erection of a storage building would be lawful.
-
26/P/00792 Granted
53 Woodbridge Road, Guildford, GU1 4RF
Certificate of lawfulness for a proposed development to establish whether the loft conversion to habitable accommodation with insertion of 5 rooflights is lawful.
-
26/P/00441 Refused
26 Harvey Road, Guildford, GU1 3SE
Certificate of lawfulness for a proposed development to establish whether the formation of a permeable hardstanding within the front curtilage, minor regrading of existing ground levels to accommodate the natural slope of the site and improve visibility, installation of a permeable sub-base and surface treatment to allow for the infiltration of surface water within the site, alteration to the existing boundary treatment (limited to the formation of an opening to facilitate access) and associated edge treatments would be lawful.