Skip to content
PlanIndex Get alerts
Menu

Planning application

Cranleigh Orchard Gate Esher Surrey KT10 8HY

Refused Elmbridge 2021/2026 Tree Preservation Order

Works: Trees

Refused. Only the applicant can appeal, within the statutory time limit, and a revised scheme can be submitted instead.

Proposal

Tree Preservation Order EL:10/08 - Crown lift and crown clear 1 x Pine.

As published by the council, reference 2021/2026

Application record

Reference
2021/2026
Type
Tree Preservation Order
Status
Final Decision
Decision
Refused As published: Refuse Proposed Tree Work
Received
4 Jun 2021
Validated
4 Jun 2021
Decided
28 Jul 2021
Ward
Hinchley Wood and Weston Green Ward
Decision by
Officer delegated
Postcode
KT10 8HY

Site history

Applications at this address on the Elmbridge register

This site has had 3 applications since 2021: 1 approved, 1 refused.

  • 2025/3153 Granted

    Cranleigh Orchard Gate Esher Surrey KT10 8HY

    Tree Preservation Order EL:10/08 - T1 Pine EL:10/08 The specification below resulted from a pre planning application (site visit 15/10/25) Works proposed are available as annotated images of reference 2025/2311 Branch closest to house (see annotated image). Cut back to stem. Branches x2 growing towards lamp post (see annotated image). Cut back to stem. Branches (dead) x2 growing towards lamp post (see annotated image). Cut back to stem. This is a small step in the right direction and is in keeping with good arboricultural practice so thank you. I did raise the following three concerns at the pre planning meeting and would like them to be recorded on this portal: 1- We remain uneasy about the high number of pine cones falling on to the busy public pavement leading to the church, community hall, common and pond. In the site visit it was very apparent how many people use this path. It is of concern that elderly people in particular may be at risk of stumbling on the loose pine cones especially in the dark. I raised this as potential trip hazard but, it was not felt by EBC to be sufficiently significant to warrant cutting back the overhanging branches. As landowners we are therefore unable to take any action to mitigate this risk. 2- The church building of All Saints Weston Green has just been repainted. The pine now entirely blocks the view from the road and pavement on to this building. Perhaps this doesn't matter but it does seem something of a conflict that we are protecting the benefits of the black pine as a visual amenity but in so doing losing the visual impact of a building on which in the last 12 months over £100,000 of community and public money has been spent. 3- From the point of view of our own house, the tree blocks much light to the front of the house, (thank you for noting that we can remove the branch closest to the house - this will help), the grass is non-existent in the summer, and as noted in the site visit, many plants, small trees and shrubs, dep

    Decided 9 Feb 2026 Trees
  • 2021/2944 Split decision

    Cranleigh Orchard Gate Esher Surrey KT10 8HY

    Tree Preservation Order EL:10/08 - Crown reduce by 1m 1 x Pine.

    Decided 1 Nov 2021 Trees

Timeline

Dates from the published record

  1. 4 Jun 2021

    Received by Elmbridge

  2. 28 Jul 2021

    Decision issued: Refuse Proposed Tree Work

  3. 30 Jul 2026

    Added to PlanIndex

Documents

Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report

4 documents on file for this application

A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.

Watch members (£5 a month) open the document list from here.

Open the documents

What this refusal means

Elmbridge refused this application for the reasons on the decision notice; only the applicant can appeal, and refused schemes often return in revised form. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.

About tree works applications

Applications for works to trees cover protected trees: consent under a tree preservation order, or six weeks notice for trees in a conservation area. More in our guide to planning application types.

Nearby applications

Within 0.3 miles

  • Cranleigh Orchard Gate Esher Surrey KT10 8HY

    2021/2944 Submitted 13 Aug 2021 50 yards away

    Tree Preservation Order EL:10/08 - Crown reduce by 1m 1 x Pine.

    Split decision Trees 9 docs
  • Cranleigh Orchard Gate Esher Surrey KT10 8HY

    2025/3153 Submitted 24 Nov 2025 50 yards away

    Tree Preservation Order EL:10/08 - T1 Pine EL:10/08 The specification below resulted from a pre planning application (site visit 15/10/25) Works proposed are available as annotated images of reference 2025/2311 Branch closest to house (see annotated image). Cut back to stem. Branches x2 growing towards lamp post (see annotated image). Cut back to stem. Branches (dead) x2 growing towards lamp post (see annotated image). Cut back to stem. This is a small step in the right direction and is in keeping with good arboricultural practice so thank you. I did raise the following three concerns at the pre planning meeting and would like them to be recorded on this portal: 1- We remain uneasy about the high number of pine cones falling on to the busy public pavement leading to the church, community hall, common and pond. In the site visit it was very apparent how many people use this path. It is of concern that elderly people in particular may be at risk of stumbling on the loose pine cones especially in the dark. I raised this as potential trip hazard but, it was not felt by EBC to be sufficiently significant to warrant cutting back the overhanging branches. As landowners we are therefore unable to take any action to mitigate this risk. 2- The church building of All Saints Weston Green has just been repainted. The pine now entirely blocks the view from the road and pavement on to this building. Perhaps this doesn't matter but it does seem something of a conflict that we are protecting the benefits of the black pine as a visual amenity but in so doing losing the visual impact of a building on which in the last 12 months over £100,000 of community and public money has been spent. 3- From the point of view of our own house, the tree blocks much light to the front of the house, (thank you for noting that we can remove the branch closest to the house - this will help), the grass is non-existent in the summer, and as noted in the site visit, many plants, small trees and shrubs, dep

    Granted Trees 6 docs
  • Fairways Grove End Lane Esher Surrey KT10 8JA

    2021/1666 Submitted 7 May 2021 100 yards away

    Detached two-storey house with room in the roof space following demolition of existing house.

    Granted Full applications Demolition 27 docs
  • 21 Oaklands Avenue Esher Surrey KT10 8HX

    2022/2434 Submitted 3 Aug 2022 150 yards away

    Replacement of roof incorporating rear Juliet balcony and rooflights to provide rooms in the roof space, first-floor side extension and alterations to fenestration.

    Granted Householder Extension Loft or dormer +1 12 docs
    Domestic
  • 31 Imber Park Road Esher Surrey KT10 8JB

    2023/1860 Submitted 3 Jul 2023 150 yards away

    Single storey side/rear extension and integral garage.

    Refused Householder Extension 10 docs
    Small domestic
  • 31 Imber Park Road Esher Surrey KT10 8JB

    2021/4297 Submitted 15 Dec 2021 150 yards away

    Single-storey side extension.

    Refused Householder Extension 27 docs
    Small domestic

In Elmbridge

  • 2026/1962 Granted

    16 Thames Street Walton-On-Thames Surrey KT12 2PU

    Walton Bridge Street/Church Street Conservation Area - We have 2 cherry trees one on our driveway and one in our back garden. Both are c10m high. We wish to prune them so that the large overhanging branches are reduced by approx 1m. Currently the tree branches overhang our driveway and the pavement next to our house and across our neighbours back garden (the tree is by a shared fence).

    Received 11 Aug, published by the council 21 Aug 2026 Trees
  • 2026/1929 Granted

    26 Burwood Park Road Hersham Walton-On-Thames Surrey KT12 5LJ

    Tree Preservation Order EL:300 - T1 Oak - remove deadwood and raise the crown to 3.5m from ground level T2 Oak - remove deadwood and raise the crown to 3.5m from ground level To give clearance around outbuilding, to make the rear of the garden a more useable space and to encourage more light into the area

    Received 6 Aug, published by the council 14 Aug 2026 Trees
  • 2026/1915 Granted

    3 Waterview Place Berkeley Court Weybridge Surrey KT13 9HY

    Tree Preservation Order EL:20/44 - TPO EL:20/44 plan refers Barrell Report contained in Planning Permission 2018/2316 outlines the work that is to be carried out: removal of lower lateral branch

    Received 5 Aug, published by the council 14 Aug 2026 Trees
  • 2026/1905 Granted

    Oatlands Court St Marys Road Weybridge Surrey KT13 9QE

    Tree Preservation Order EL:04/13 - T4, Oak, Reduce the crown/stem height by approximately 3m, including removal of the larger lateral branch extending West from the main stem, back to suitable lateral growth points on the North and South sides at an approximate height of 8m. Reduce the radial spread of the crown by approximately 1.5m to the North and South, and by approximately 2m to the South-West over the road. Prune the remaining crown as needed to achieve an even crown form.

    Received 4 Aug, published by the council 14 Aug 2026 Trees
  • 2026/1836 Granted

    Land Side of Portsmouth Road Portsmouth Road Cobham KT11 2NH

    Tree Preservation Order EL:18/07 - T1 - Horse chestnut - Proposed Works: Crown lift over the roadside only to provide a minimum clearance of 5.2 metres above ground level. All pruning shall be limited to secondary branches where practicable and carried out in accordance with BS3998:2010 Tree Work Recommendations, with a maximum pruning wound diameter of 50mm. Reason for Proposed Works: Following a tree survey, it was identified that the crown over the carriageway has been subject to contact from larger vehicles in the past. The proposed crown lift will provide appropriate clearance for high-sided vehicles, reducing the likelihood of future vehicle strikes and preventing unnecessary damage to the tree, whilst retaining its long-term health and amenity value.

    Received 28 Jul, published by the council 7 Aug 2026 Trees