Planning application
39 STIRLING CRESCENT, HEDGE END, SOUTHAMPTON, SO30 2SA
Works: Trees
Refused. Only the applicant can appeal, within the statutory time limit, and a revised scheme can be submitted instead.
Proposal
1no. Oak (T1, originates from no. 37) - Reduce crown on south side to give at least 3m clearance of the building to alleviate squirrel damage to roof and fascias. 1no. Hawthorn (T2, originates from no. 37) - Reduce back to clear building by up to 3m 1no. Oak (T3, originates from no. 31A) - Reduce by 2.5 m over garden of no. 39.
As published by the council, reference T/26/101525
Application record
- Reference
- T/26/101525
- Type
- Consent under Tree Preservation Orders
- Status
- Decided Part Consent Part Refuse Trees
- Decision
- Part Consent Part Refuse Trees
- Received
- 5 Jun 2026
- Validated
- 5 Jun 2026
- Decided
- 30 Jul 2026
- Ward
- Hedge End North Ward
- Parish
- Hedge End CP
- Decision by
- Delegated Decision
- Postcode
- SO30 2SA
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
5 Jun 2026
Received by Eastleigh
-
25 Jul 2026
Added to PlanIndex
-
30 Jul 2026
Decision issued: Part Consent Part Refuse Trees
Documents
Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report
4 documents on file for this application
A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.
Trade members open them from here.
Open the documentsWhat this refusal means
Eastleigh refused this application for the reasons on the decision notice; only the applicant can appeal, and refused schemes often return in revised form. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.
About tree works applications
Applications for works to trees cover protected trees: consent under a tree preservation order, or six weeks notice for trees in a conservation area. More in our guide to planning application types.
Nearby applications
Within 500 metres
-
19 STIRLING CRESCENT, HEDGE END, SOUTHAMPTON, SO30 2SA
1 Group of 5 Oak (TPO 114-E, originates from No. 21) - Reduce and reshape the canopy by 3m to stop the branches hitting the property in the wind.
Granted Trees 5 docs -
41 STIRLING CRESCENT, HEDGE END, SOUTHAMPTON, SO30 2SA
Erection of a single storey rear extension following demolition of existing conservatory, and conversion of the existing garage to form a study and store
Granted Householder Extension Demolition 10 docsSmall domestic -
11 STIRLING CRESCENT, HEDGE END, SOUTHAMPTON, SO30 2SA
1no. Group of Oak - Prune back the overhang such that the closest point is 2m away from the nearest point of the house (including conservatory), crown lift to 6m above ground such that the canopy's lowest point over the garden is 6m. The tree in question is on the other side of the fence in the Garden of 21 Stirling Crescent. Posing a risk of structural damage to a conservatory should any break off. Therefore wish to carry out crown reduction to reduce the overhang.
Granted Trees 4 docsSmall domestic -
51 STIRLING CRESCENT, HEDGE END, SOUTHAMPTON, SO30 2SA
1 no. Macrocarpa - to reduce heavy overextending lateral limbs over the garden by 2 metres.
Granted Trees 4 docs -
21 STIRLING CRESCENT, HEDGE END, SOUTHAMPTON, SO30 2SA
1no. Oak (T1) - Reduce overhanging limbs by approx. 3-4m to give 2m clearance from property. 1no. Oak (T2) - Reduce by 4-5 meters to match/blend in with the clearance from T1. Tree is leaning. 1no. Oak (T3) - Reduce overhanging limbs to the property by approx 5m and shape into the remaining canopy.
Refused Trees 4 docs -
36 STIRLING CRESCENT, HEDGE END, SOUTHAMPTON, SO30 2SB
Construction of single storey rear and side extension; and construction of detached garage
Granted Householder Extension 20 docsSmall domestic
Other tree works applications
In Eastleigh
-
T/26/101855 Granted
11 VALLEY ROAD, CHANDLER'S FORD, EASTLEIGH, SO53 1GQ
1 No. Oak (297-E) - Remove growth from trunk to height 3m. Growth consists of five lateral branches all from the south west side of the Oak's trunk. This will rebalance the oak's previous shape, restore its historical crown height (~5m from ground level), increase light and prevent low branch obstruction.
-
T/26/101834 Refused
10 GORDON ROAD, CHANDLER'S FORD, EASTLEIGH, SO53 5AN
1 No. Oak (T1) - Crown reduction by 1.5m to curtail growth & shading of properties. 2 No. Oak (T2 & T3) - Crown lift, removing lower secondary branches to give 6m clearance over rear garden & improve shape.
-
T/26/101850 Refused
DERWENT, 28 LAKEWOOD ROAD, CHANDLER'S FORD, EASTLEIGH, SO53 1EW
1no. Redwood (T4, originates from no. 30) - Crown lift of bottom 9 branches, to increase the amount of light reaching ground level. This is necessitated due to the dense nature of the tree's branches. This amounts to no more than a crown lift of 1m.
-
T/26/101841 Granted
82 HILTINGBURY ROAD, CHANDLER'S FORD, EASTLEIGH, SO53 5NZ
1 No. Sweet Chestnut (T1) - Crown lift 3x lower branches by 3.5m to allow room underneath tree to stop the customer hitting their heads. 1 No. Beech (T2) - Crown lift lower branches by 5m and reduce branch back away from strawberry tree to give a 2m clearance, to allow ground clearance.
-
T/26/102073 Decided
17 FOREST CLOSE, CHANDLER'S FORD, EASTLEIGH, SO53 1NB
1no. Silver Birch (T1) - Dismantle the to ground level. Replant with new Silver Birch as like-for-like replacement. Tree is in decline and is shedding significant deadwood from canopy. Main stem has an old major pruning/wound point with significant dysfunction and deterioration around the union. Remaining upright stem originates above this compromised area, creating potential structural weak point. The pronounced change in stem direction also places additional mechanical loading and leverage on weakened section, particularly during high winds.