Skip to content
PlanIndex Get alerts
Menu

Planning application

Land Parcel Opposite Gorston House Ampney Crucis Gloucestershire

Refused Cotswold 26/02138/PLP

Refused. Only the applicant can appeal, within the statutory time limit, and a revised scheme can be submitted instead.

Proposal

Permission in Principle application for the erection of a maximum of 6no. residential dwellings and creation of vehicle and pedestrian access

As published by the council, reference 26/02138/PLP

Application record

Reference
26/02138/PLP
Status
Decided
Decision
Refused As published: Application Refused
Received
15 Jul 2026
Validated
15 Jul 2026
Decided
6 Oct 2026
Ward
The Ampneys & Hampton
Parish
Ampney Crucis
Decision by
Delegated Decision

Timeline

Dates from the published record

  1. 15 Jul 2026

    Received by Cotswold

  2. 1 Aug 2026

    Added to PlanIndex

  3. 6 Oct 2026

    Decision issued: Application Refused

Documents

Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report

15 documents on file for this application

  • RESPONSE TO COTSWOLD DISTRICT COUNCIL'S SENIOR CONSERVATION AND DESIGN OFFICER C Report · 28 Aug 2026
  • KELLY Objection Comment · 26 Aug 2026
  • COURTOWN Objection Comment · 26 Aug 2026
  • UNDERWOOD Objection Comment · 26 Aug 2026
  • CROOK (DOUGLAS) Objection Comment · 25 Aug 2026
  • CROOK (DEBORAH) Objection Comment · 25 Aug 2026
  • CROOK Objection Comment · 25 Aug 2026
  • PADDISON Objection Comment · 24 Aug 2026
  • OXENBURY Objection Comment · 24 Aug 2026
  • LOMAS Objection Comment · 24 Aug 2026
  • UNDERWOOD Objection Comment · 23 Aug 2026
  • BORG Objection Comment · 23 Aug 2026
  • GLUNING Objection Comment · 23 Aug 2026
  • BATES Objection Comment · 23 Aug 2026
  • PADDISON Objection Comment · 23 Aug 2026
  • BORG Objection Comment · 22 Aug 2026
  • HADEN Objection Comment · 22 Aug 2026
  • HADEN Objection Comment · 22 Aug 2026
  • TOMPSON Objection Comment · 19 Aug 2026
  • GRIMMER Objection Comment · 18 Aug 2026
  • FAGGE Objection Comment · 18 Aug 2026
  • CLARKSON Objection Comment · 17 Aug 2026
  • JONES Objection Comment · 17 Aug 2026
  • KIRK Objection Comment · 17 Aug 2026
  • TANNER Objection Comment · 17 Aug 2026
  • KIRK Objection Comment · 17 Aug 2026
  • JEFFERIES Objection Comment · 17 Aug 2026
  • COURTOWN Objection Comment · 16 Aug 2026
  • MEADOWS Objection Comment · 16 Aug 2026
  • HOLT Objection Comment · 15 Aug 2026
  • JACKSON Objection Comment · 14 Aug 2026
  • FISHER Objection Comment · 14 Aug 2026
  • WILLIAMS Objection Comment · 14 Aug 2026
  • JONES Objection Comment · 14 Aug 2026
  • GCC ARCHAEOLOGIST Consultee Comment · 14 Aug 2026
  • PARISH COUNCIL Consultee Comment · 14 Aug 2026
  • SABOURIN General Comment · 13 Aug 2026
  • BENHAM (L) Objection Comment · 13 Aug 2026
  • NAPIER Objection Comment · 13 Aug 2026
  • LEWIS Objection Comment · 13 Aug 2026
  • WADLAND Objection Comment · 12 Aug 2026
  • KEAY Objection Comment · 12 Aug 2026
  • JACKSON Objection Comment · 12 Aug 2026
  • LAZENBY (A) Objection Comment · 12 Aug 2026
  • HOPKINS (D) Objection Comment · 12 Aug 2026
  • LAZENBY (B) Objection Comment · 12 Aug 2026
  • BENHAM (D) Objection Comment · 12 Aug 2026
  • LEADBEATER (J) Objection Comment · 12 Aug 2026
  • LEADBEATER (R) Objection Comment · 12 Aug 2026
  • KIRBY Objection Comment · 12 Aug 2026
  • KIRBY (L) Objection Comment · 12 Aug 2026
  • KIRBY (M) Objection Comment · 12 Aug 2026
  • KIRBY (SUPPLEMENTARY) Objection Comment · 12 Aug 2026
  • ARMITAGE Objection Comment · 11 Aug 2026
  • ARMITAGE Objection Comment · 11 Aug 2026
  • SOWLER Objection Comment · 11 Aug 2026
  • BAILES Objection Comment · 11 Aug 2026
  • TAYLOR Objection Comment · 11 Aug 2026
  • VALENTINE (ALICE) Objection Comment · 10 Aug 2026
  • M,KIRBY Objection Comment · 10 Aug 2026
  • M,KIRBY Objection Comment · 10 Aug 2026
  • KIRBY Objection Comment · 10 Aug 2026
  • ASHMORE Objection Comment · 10 Aug 2026
  • VALENTINE (ADRIAN) Objection Comment · 10 Aug 2026
  • WILLIAMS Objection Comment · 10 Aug 2026
  • FULLICK Objection Comment · 09 Aug 2026
  • RICHARDSON Objection Comment · 09 Aug 2026
  • FOLEY (M) Objection Comment · 09 Aug 2026
  • FOLEY (A) Objection Comment · 09 Aug 2026
  • PERRY Objection Comment · 08 Aug 2026
  • BILTON Objection Comment · 08 Aug 2026
  • HAYES Objection Comment · 06 Aug 2026
  • HOLT (S) Objection Comment · 06 Aug 2026
  • PILE Objection Comment · 06 Aug 2026
  • GCC ARCHAEOLOGIST Consultee Comment · 05 Aug 2026
  • HOLT (N) Objection Comment · 05 Aug 2026
  • HIGHWAYS DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT Consultee Comment · 04 Aug 2026
  • CAREER GRADE FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT OFFICER Consultee Comment · 03 Aug 2026
  • NICHOLS Objection Comment · 02 Aug 2026
  • HOLLAND Objection Comment · 31 Jul 2026
  • SENIOR CONSERVATION & DESIGN OFFICER SUBMITTED ONLINE Consultee Comment · 31 Jul 2026
  • MAGSON Objection Comment · 29 Jul 2026
  • REQUISITE NOTICE Superseded Document · 28 Jul 2026
  • ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CONTAMINATION Consultee Comment · 28 Jul 2026
  • ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CONTAMINATION Consultee Comment · 28 Jul 2026
  • SENIOR BIODIVERSITY OFFICER Consultee Comment · 27 Jul 2026
  • HOLT Objection Comment · 27 Jul 2026
  • HOPKINS (E) Objection Comment · 27 Jul 2026
  • HINDLE Objection Comment · 21 Jul 2026
  • SITE LOCATION PLAN Drawing · 15 Jul 2026
  • HERITAGE STATEMENT Report · 15 Jul 2026
  • SITE BLOCK PLAN Drawing · 15 Jul 2026
  • PROPOSED SITE LAYOUT PLAN Drawing · 15 Jul 2026
  • PLANNING STATEMENT Report · 15 Jul 2026

Watch members (£5 a month) open the document list from here.

Open the documents

What this refusal means

Cotswold refused this application for the reasons on the decision notice; only the applicant can appeal, and refused schemes often return in revised form. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.

About this record

The published feed does not state which type of application this is; the register entry on Cotswold's portal will say. Our guide explains the common types.