Planning application
4A Brackenhill Poole BH13 6LT
Works: Trees
Permission granted. Work must normally begin within three years of the decision or the permission lapses.
Proposal
T1 - Macrocarpa - Dead - Fell
As published by the council, reference P/26/04133/REG14
Application record
- Reference
- P/26/04133/REG14
- Type
- Regulation 14 - Dead and Dangerous
- Status
- No Objections Raised
- Decision
- Granted As published: No objections raised
- Received
- 26 Aug 2026
- Validated
- 26 Aug 2026
- Decided
- 27 Aug 2026
- Ward
- Canford Cliffs
- Parish
- Poole Town Council
- Decision by
- Delegated
- Postcode
- BH13 6LT
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
26 Aug 2026
Received by Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole
-
27 Aug 2026
Decision issued: No objections raised
-
30 Aug 2026
Added to PlanIndex
Documents
Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report
2 documents on file for this application
A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.
Watch members (£5 a month) open the document list from here.
Open the documentsWhat this grant of permission means
Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole granted permission on 27 August 2026, subject to any conditions on the decision notice. Work must normally begin within three years or the permission lapses. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.
About tree works applications
Applications for works to trees cover protected trees: consent under a tree preservation order, or six weeks notice for trees in a conservation area. More in our guide to planning application types.
Nearby applications
Within 0.3 miles
-
4 Brackenhill Poole BH13 6LT
88% historically approved · decision due ~12 Jan
1) The North side of our garden extends westwards to a particular line. The lawn of our next door neighbour's house (4a) also extends to this same line. 2) Along this line is a 2.4 meter high "king post and sleeper" retaining wall. At the bottom of this wall the land is a steep slope down to our perimeter fence (alongside Lakeside Road). 3) When extending the garden westwards (during the housebuild) - our vendor wanted to have the South side of the garden extending to the same line as the North side. However, a TPO on a tree ("T3") in our neighbour's garden (3 Brackenhill) prevented this. 4) In 2024, the owners of 3 Brackenhill discovered that "T3" was diseased. They received official permission, and felled it. 5) As "T3" is no longer an issue we want to extend the South side of the garden, westward, to the same line as the North side. 6) Our reasons: • So our whole garden will be aligned. • It will be in line with the square garden next door at 4a. • The enlarged South side will then have space to hold a 30 meter-square garden studio. 7) We hear that Planning Permission is required because we will be raising ground "by more than 1ft". 8) We consulted a Structural Engineer (Simon Rayner, Alan Baxter Partnership LLP) regarding what construction to use for the new retaining wall (along the newly extended South side of garden). He advised to replicate the same construction as on the North side. IE: "king post and sleeper". 9) We then consulted an Arboricultural Surveyor (Gwydion Howell, GTree Ltd). He pointed out that there is a Maritime Pine with a TPO on it (on No. 3's land. Interestingly, this tree is variously named "T5" and/or "T9". Mr Howell did Arboricultural Surveying work for No. 3 Brackenhill last year, so he referred to his existing data and advised: "The protected area around T9 should be a radius of 9m - but one could squeeze another 30cm (ie: radius of 8.7m) to account for the fall in ground levels." He advised that BCP Planning Office would typically accepting construction over a protected area like this IF the structure was permeable (eg. "decking"). 10) Therefore, we are planning to extend the South side of the garden in two different constructions: i. The most northerly section as "king post and sleeper" construction (filled with earth & topped with a grass lawn). ii. The most southerly section (NB: this is constructed over the protected radius of the TPO tree) as a suspended platform of Decking. 11) As we will be extending our garden out, we have addressed the possible problem of reduced privacy for our neighbours at No. 3, by having a fence along the south side of the Suspended Decking. Therefore, there will be two rows of fencing, AND a Garden Studio building, between our neighbours' garden and our newly-extended South side garden. 12) We showed our plans to our neighbours at No. 3. They responded: "designs look great!" "You have no objections from us". 13) Our neighbours at No. 4a responded with "they look great"
Awaiting decision Householder Trees 13 docsSmall domestic -
9 Buccleuch Road Poole BH13 6LB
96% historically approved · decision due ~8 Jan
4x Maritime pine - remove deadwood
Awaiting decision Trees -
-
1 Buccleuch Road Poole BH13 6LB
T1- Holm Oak tree. Along the right boundary in close proximity to the house to be crown lifted to 5m removing small diameter branches. To also reduce back the obvious selective overextended branches growing towards the property to help achieve the same goal as well as to tidy up the canopy. T2- Holm Oak tree. At the rear of the property to have the the 2x lowest branches growing towards the property removed and the remaining lower branches reduced back by up to 2m back to appropriate growth points.
Granted Trees 2 docs -
3 Buccleuch Road Poole BH13 6LB
T1- Beech - crown lift to 6m all round and lower overextended branches reduced by up to 1.5m. Thin out by removing small diameter internal branches no bigger than 40mm. This would be a 10% thin. T2- Twin stem Oak - reduce the lateral branches by up to 2m back to appropriate growth points and reduce the top by 1.5m back to appropriate growth points. T3 - Oak - remove lowest lateral branch to crown lift the tree. Reduce the remaining lower lateral branches by up to 2m back to appropriate growth points.
Granted Trees 7 docs -
6 Buccleuch Road Poole BH13 6LE
T1- Oak - Reduce section of branches close and touching the buildings roof to a clearance of 2m.
Granted Trees 5 docs
Other tree works applications
In Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole
-
P/26/03266/TTPO Split decision
Milne Court 11A Stourwood Avenue Bournemouth BH6 3QD
T16-Holm Oak: Undertake a full crown reduction of no more than 1m from the tips inwards. Ensuring that no pruning wounds exceed 60mm in diameter and that all cuts are brought back to viable growth points. Raise the crown to 3m from ground level. Remove the lowest primary branch over the parking bay. See lesser works.
-
P/26/03552/TTPO Split decision
59 Stour Way Christchurch BH23 2PY
T1 Oak - Crown raise to 7.5m from ground level all the way around remove epicormic growth up to 8m and tip back by 1m from front of property this work is carried out every 4-5 years to be able to have a large tree in a small space clearing highway as large caravans are delivered in winter
-
P/26/03110/TTPO Refused
Keverstone Court 97 Manor Road Bournemouth BH1 3BZ
T1- Holm Oak - Fell and replace with a tree under the tree officers discretion in a more suitable location. T2- Holm Oak Fell. Fell and replace with a Cherry prunus.
-
P/26/03780/TTPO Granted
Pebble Beach 47A Links Road Poole BH14 9QS
T1 - Liquid amber - Overall reduction by 1.5m to shape and allow more light into garden. T2 - Oak - Crown lift to 4m. Reduce lateral limbs by 1.5m to shape.
-
P/26/03824/TTPO Granted
13 Little Forest Road Bournemouth BH4 9NN
T32- Scots Pine - Crown lift lower hanging branches over the road to a height of 5.2m from ground level. Crown lift lower secondary branches over neighbouring property’s driveway to a height of 4m from ground level. T33- Cedar - Reduce one overextending branch by 2m to a suitable growing point as shown in the photograph. T34- Scots Pine-Crown lift lower hanging branches over the road to a height of 5.2m from ground level.