Planning application
AVA/2021/0589
34 Queen Street Waingroves Ripley Derbyshire DE5 9TJ
Proposal
Replacement detached garage to rear of house
As published by the council, reference AVA/2021/0589
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
19 May 2021
Received by Amber Valley
-
20 May 2021
Validated
Checked as complete and ready for consideration.
-
23 Jul 2021
Decision issued: PER
-
22 Jul 2026
Added to PlanIndex
After the decision
The process from here
The council has decided this application; the published outcome sits in the record above and the decision notice on the council portal carries the detail, including any conditions.
If permission was granted, work must normally begin within three years of the decision. If it was refused, the applicant can appeal within the statutory time limit or submit a revised scheme.
About this record
Reading the register
This page mirrors an entry on the statutory planning register that Amber Valley is required to keep. The published feed for this record does not state which type of application it is, which is common for older entries and for some council systems; the register entry on the council portal will say, alongside the case officer and any consultation dates.
Every planning application follows the same broad path: submission, validation, publicity, then a decision by officers or committee. Our guide to planning application types explains the common types and what each can approve.
Nearby applications
Within 500 metres
-
AVA/2026/0409 Awaiting decision
53 Pruning Drive Ripley Derbyshire DE5 3QG
Proposed single storey front extension and porch
-
AVA/2024/0636 Decided
11 Queensview Drive Waingroves Ripley Derbyshire DE5 9TP
Retention of existing shed to be used as a dog grooming salon
-
TRE/2022/0069 Awaiting decision
84 Thomson Drive Codnor Ripley Derbyshire DE5 9RU
We are looking to improve our garden by way of installing a new fence up the west side of our property. The most northerly part of our border is in the form of an hawthorn hedge/bush and holly bush. This portion of the border is very unsightly and has grown in a hap-hazard fashion (i.e. has massive gaps at the base so as not providing a adequate barrier / border into the adjacent field). The fact the both these plants have spikey foliage also prevents a worrying problem as we have two children under 3 years of age. My wife is currently 38 years old and remembers this hedge not existing when she was young (approximately 7-10 years of age).