JMW Arboriculture Ltd

Park Farm Main Street Womersley South Yorkshire DN6 9BG

Application for consent to fell 1No Ash tree (T1), 1No Beech tree (T2) and 1No Sycamore tree (T3) covered by TPO 13/1992

Park Farm Main Street Womersley South Yorkshire DN6 9BG

Application for consent to fell 1No Ash tree (T1), 1No Beech tree (T2) and 1No Sycamore tree (T3) covered by TPO 13/1992

Park Farm Main Street Womersley South Yorkshire DN6 9BG

Application for consent to fell 1No Ash tree (T1), 1No Beech tree (T2) and 1No Sycamore tree (T3) covered by TPO 13/1992

Park Farm Main Street Womersley South Yorkshire DN6 9BG

Application for consent to fell 1No Ash tree (T1), 1No Beech tree (T2) and 1No Sycamore tree (T3) covered by TPO 13/1992

Park Farm Main Street Womersley South Yorkshire DN6 9BG

Application for consent to fell 1No Ash tree (T1), 1No Beech tree (T2) and 1No Sycamore tree (T3) covered by TPO 13/1992

Fort Villa 1 Wonford Street Exeter EX2 5HU

Cedar T1 Specification - Reduce the top of the tree back to the previous point at approximately 17m above ground level by removing the 'dog leg' apical stem, using a 150mm maximum cut diameter. - Reduce the sides of the western, northern and eastern crown aspects by up to 2m from 5.5m to approximately 3.5m, using a 60mm maximum cut diameter Justification - There has been notable excavation undertaken within 30cm of the main stem, which includes some root severance - The greatest risk is from the tree uprooting and striking several parked cars; this risk is considered tolerable. - Without seeing the tree before the disturbance, it is difficult to form a confident opinion, on that basis intervention is merited. Holly T3 Specification - Fell Justification - The base of the northern stem is growing in contact with the pillar of the retaining wall. The wall is pushing out towards the footpath (away from the tree) and there are extensive cracks travelling along the mortar. - Reparation works do not seem merited with the tree in situ. Replacement tree - Planted on the greenspace approx. 4m to the east - 1x bare root (8-10) standard Hornbeam

Meadow Bank 16 Penpethy Road Brixham TQ5 8NW

Beech T2 specifications 1) Reduce the sides of the southern, western and northwestern aspects of the crown by 2-3m with a 100mm maximum cut diameter. This northwestern crown radius will reduce from approximately 7m to 5m. The southern crown radius will reduce from approximately 7m to 5m. The western crown radius will reduce from approximately 14m to 11m. 2) Remove the lowest limb in the southern crown - approximately 200mm in diameter Beech T2 reason for works (Tree report must be read) Previous root disturbance is suspected - potentially destabilising the rooting system. The tree has a significant crown bias to the west. Pruning will reduce the loading on the root system and therefore reduce the likelihood of it uprooting. Tree stands within falling distance to parking. The lowest limb is struck by delivery vehicles, there are limited options for branch reduction. Beech T3 specifications 1) Reduce the sides of the northern, eastern and southern crown aspects by 2.5m ? use a 100mm maximum cut diameter. The crown radius will reduce from approximately 8m to 5.5m. 2) Reduce the top of the tree by 1.5m - use a 75mm maximum cut diameter. The height of the tree will reduce from approximately 19.5m to 18m. Beech T3 reason for works (Tree report must be read) The base of the main stem is decayed. Pruning will reduce bending load and torsional load on the stem base and reduce the likelihood of stem failure. The tree stands within falling distance to the neighbour's house.

Unit 10 To 12 Kestrel Business Park Kestrel Way Sowton Industrial Estate Exeter EX2 7JS

Grey Poplar T1 Justification The crown hangs low over the compound and is beginning to obstruct the use of the machinery, as well limiting access to high sided vehicles. There is also some epicormic growth on the main stem which is also beginning to become an obstruction. It overhangs the compound and several machines and pieces of equipment essential to the operation of the business, as well as the operatives. There are several hyperextended lateral branches throughout the crown. This is most apparent in the western aspect, where the branches are disproportionately long. Such as the species profile, the likelihood of failure from a large lateral branch is moderate. Specification of works ? Remove the epicormic growth from the main stem with a 100mm maximum cut diameter. ? Crown raise to 5.5m above ground level on the western aspect by removing the lowest four branches with a 125mm maximum cut diameter. ? Reduce the side of the remaining western crown aspect by 4m with a 125mm maximum cut diameter. ? Reduce the side of the rest of the crown 2-3m with a 100mm maximum cut diameter to maintain some crown symmetry, target branches that extend beyond the general crown profile.

2 Chestnut Court Exeter EX2 8XY

Horse Chestnut T1 Reasons for proposed work - The crown also hangs low over the road and over the garden. In some places it hangs less than 2m above ground level and is becoming obstructive. There is a large dead stub at 2m on the southern aspect as a result of poor previous pruning work. It is unsightly and contributes very little to the amenity of the tree. Proposed specification of works - Remove the branch stub located at 1.5m above ground level in the southwestern aspect. Remove the lowest branch in the south eastern aspect with an approximate diameter of 125mm. Crown raise the remaining crown to 4.5m above ground level. This should be achieved with a 75mm maximum cut diameter.

Fort Villa 1 Wonford Street Exeter EX2 5HU

Cedar T1 Proposed specification: Reduce the radial spread of the lower southern crown from 5m to 3m by removing approximately 2m, with a 60mm maximum cut diameter. Reason for proposed works: Early intervention to prevent the southern crown aspect growing in contact with the wall and the overhead telecoms wires. Ash T2 Proposed specification: Reduce the radial spread of the southern crown aspect from 5m to 3m by removing approximately 2m, with a 60mm maximum cut diameter. Reason for proposed works: Early intervention to prevent the southern side of the crown growing in contact with neighbouring property or further overhanging it.